Waiting around for electrocutions to justify safety grounds for a particular device just doesn't seem right to me.
In fact, we do wait for electrocutions and traffic deaths and plane crashes to make many decisions about where we spend our money to make things safer.
If we had some regulatory agency running around deciding to implement every means they could think of to make things safer, without any demonstration of a significant hazard or risk to safety, everything would cost more and we would stifle the economy of the country.
Just think of the things you could do. We have 40,000 traffic deaths each year, which could be cut to 1/4 of that if we simply insisted on governors on all cars and trucks to limit speeds to 25 MPH.
We could cut down on deaths due to falling down stairs if every stairway had to be at a slope not steeper than 1 in 12 feet.
And we could cut down on electrocutions if we insisted that all power systems operate at no more than 24 Volts.