- Location
- Massachusetts
I am involved in a service upgrade for a condo building, I recommended recording meters be installed to determine the existing load.
What has prompted this is one units 100 amp main keeps tripping, that person wants to upgrade to 200 amps. The issue is the main for the entire building is only a 400.
Now the Condo owner has questions.
(Rule 3 is a local rule that allows new work without fixing existing problems)
What I am looking for is a good way to explain to the layperson that the recording meter can do an adequate job.
On the other hand I am also willing to concede this layperson may be correct.
How would you do it?
Thanks in advance, Bob
What has prompted this is one units 100 amp main keeps tripping, that person wants to upgrade to 200 amps. The issue is the main for the entire building is only a 400.
Now the Condo owner has questions.
"Since the new Unit 1 breaker trips at 100 amps and the service needs to be increased to 200 amps to accommodate the heat, electric stove, TV, computers and general lighting, the demand analysis will not and cannot reflect Unit 1 drawing more than 100 amps. As proposed, Mr. Badger's approach cannot accurately "determine the existing service load for the entire building." The new breaker works as a bottleneck. If the demand analysis erroneously concludes that 400 amps is sufficient for the building and the building's service is not upgraded, the existing FPE 400 amp breaker will be overloaded when my service is upgraded to 200 amps. It seems to me as a layperson that this situation would fly in the face of Rule 3 since it WOULD "increase the magnitude of an existing violation."
(Rule 3 is a local rule that allows new work without fixing existing problems)
What I am looking for is a good way to explain to the layperson that the recording meter can do an adequate job.
On the other hand I am also willing to concede this layperson may be correct.
How would you do it?
Thanks in advance, Bob