I've been reading this website for a while now and I'd say half the time someone fails an inspection it's because of some local code. Not even in the NEC. Wouldn't things be alot easier for everyone if all the jurisidictions were on the same page.
One place still uses the '86.
/QUOTE]
that's because thet could not afford a new code book![]()
ISTR reading that Chicago was still on NEC 19-early with -lots- of local amendments, and that there was pretty much a single copy of the original code book in a Board member's office. What's the real deal on this?
ISTR reading that Chicago was still on NEC 19-early with -lots- of local amendments, and that there was pretty much a single copy of the original code book in a Board member's office. What's the real deal on this?
Chicago does not use the NEC. Chicago uses the Chicago Electric Code, and most of the suburbs in Cook County and some other outlying counties follow that code in some fashion or another. It is really amazing the variations within the metro. area.
Here is a link to the publisher. YOU can have your VERY OWN copy for the special price of $135.00.
http://www.lawbulletin.com/real-estate/index-publishing/chicago-electrical-code
BTW, I would prefer the NEC be adopted statewide in IL. But it won't happen. Politics.
Additions or modifications to an existing installation shall be made in accordance
with this Code without bringing the remaining part of the installation into compliance with the requirements of this Code......
I only have one real beef with one of my local codes - but not because I don't know it - because everyone else does not.
In SF high-legs are purple...
In Massachusetts rule #3 is worded such that it prohibits addressing the existing violation
Silly ,..I know ,..and I can't imagine anyone getting a red tag for eliminating an existing violation ,.. but there it is in black and white.
Why is that one silly??