jwelectric
Senior Member
- Location
- North Carolina
Let me change the air handler transformer to a transformer outlined in 411 as I feel sure someone will make some remark to my analogy.
I think you have written a lot of words and said little. I see no reason that substantiates leaving a simple duplex receptacle or a 15A single pole switch out of the requirements of 110.26(A)(1)(a). They are accessible from other than the back or sides, and have renewable or replaceable parts.A remote panelboard on the other hand is outlined in the text therefore requiring the mandated working space.
What do you think about all this?
Because CMP 1 refuses to put any reasonable wording in 110.26, it applies to all electrical equipment. The installation of the required kitchen counter receptacles creates a violation of 110.26.
I agree that a remote panel can be de-energized before any work is to be done. I will return to this statement shortly.
When addressing 110.26 we seem to want to address this as being directed to disconnects only which is far from the truth. If this were true then every receptacle installed would require a space of 30 inches wide and 36 inches deep around it with nothing projecting more than 6 inches past the finish cover.
110.26 states that there must be; Sufficient access and working space shall be provided and maintained about all electrical equipment to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment.
This is an all encompassing statement about ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT as outlined in the main body of the text with subsections (A) through (G) mandating this working space around equipment.
If we look at 110.26(A)(1)(b) we see that this working space is required for a 24 volt transformer such as those found in air handling units in crawl spaces both under the floor as well as in attics but only if they require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized.
In 110.26(A)(1)(a) and (c) dead-front switchboards, panelboards, or motor control centers are outlined just as in 110.26(C)(E) and (F). In 110.26(C) this work space requirement addresses such things that contains overcurrent devices, switching devices, or control devices.
Now to answer your question I got this information from 110.26 and in ?my opinion? a disconnect for an outside AC or heat pump unit does not fit into this category. There would be no reason to work on this disconnect while it is energized no more than working on the 24 volt transformer in the air handler would require work while energized. Just as the disconnect for the motor that is located to fullfill the within sight rule.
A remote panelboard on the other hand is outlined in the text therefore requiring the mandated working space.
What do you think about all this?
Only if these items require the work while energized. Most will turn off the circuit to do these repairs and those who don?t are in violation of the safety rules of 70E. There is a reason why receptacles and switches are left out or left up to the inspector.I think you have written a lot of words and said little. I see no reason that substantiates leaving a simple duplex receptacle or a 15A single pole switch out of the requirements of 110.26(A)(1)(a). They are accessible from other than the back or sides, and have renewable or replaceable parts.
They have had several years to figure this out making me think it is not an oversight.I think Don stated the matter most simply here:
And all this time I thought that the inspector was limited to what was printed.As long as it says "all", it says "all", and the longstanding practice of leaving certain equipment out of the list is solely at the discretion of the AHJ.
In the classroom I answer this with a quote from the NECHaving the word 'likely' in that sentence leaves the whole statement up to the readers interpretation.
I think you have written a lot of words and said little.
Nothing new there, a lot of words, nothing said and mind closed.
SOP for jwelectric
It is not me that you are saying that "nothing said." All I did was quote what this site is supposed to be all about, the NEC. Now you and George are saying that the NEC is a lot of words with nothing said and it has a closed mind. SOP for iwireNothing new there, a lot of words, nothing said and mind closed. SOP for jwelectric
Then I got to thinking, could I expect anything less from the moderators of the Mike Holt web site.
Now you and George are saying that the NEC is a lot of words with nothing said and it has a closed mind.
George Stolz said:I think you have written a lot of words and said little. I see no reason that substantiates leaving a simple duplex receptacle or a 15A single pole switch out of the requirements of 110.26(A)(1)(a). They are accessible from other than the back or sides, and have renewable or replaceable parts.
Only if these items require the work while energized. Most will turn off the circuit to do these repairs and those who don?t are in violation of the safety rules of 70E. There is a reason why receptacles and switches are left out or left up to the inspector.
jwelectric said:And all this time I thought that the inspector was limited to what was printed.George Stolz said:As long as it says "all", it says "all", and the longstanding practice of leaving certain equipment out of the list is solely at the discretion of the AHJ.
Working space shall not be required in the back or sides of assemblies, such as deadfront switchboards or motor control centers...
Well my friend maybe you should ask all the moderators before making such a statement if you all don?t communicate with each other. I have been deleted. I think it was more a show of power than it was for what I posted but yes I have been deleted.Speak up Mike, say your mind. You have NEVER been censored or deleted here that I am aware of.
Nothing new there, a lot of words, nothing said and mind closed. SOP for jwelectric
No, I think it was plain he was referring to you, not the NEC. :grin:.
I am not saying it is an oversight. I am saying that they won't accept reasonable wording. All electrical equipment is likely to be examined while energized, it really doesn't matter if electrical safe work rules say you can't do this. Even if you are using the correct PPE and are troubleshooting, you are still examining the energized electrical equipment and the rules in 110.26....
They have had several years to figure this out making me think it is not an oversight. ...
If you dislike this site so much why do you keep coming back to it? Maybe you should start your own...or have a friend start one......
Boy it must be nice to be a moderator on the Mike Holt's site.
If you dislike this site so much why do you keep coming back to it? Maybe you should start your own...or have a friend start one...
it does to me. If I find a business where I do not like the management, I do not use that business. I just assume that most people are like that.Is it a moderator thing or what? Where did the implication that I didn?t like this site come from?
Just because I don?t like the attitude of some of the moderators does not mean I don?t like the site now does it?
That is exactly what the wording of this section requires. It makes the installation of the required counter top receptacles a violation and is why CMP 1 needs to accept change. We need to read the words as they are actually written as opposed to how they are normally applied. I agree that it would be unreasonable to apply the work space rules of 110.16 to switches and receptacles, but there in no provision in the code that permits those items to be installed with out 110.26(A) work space.... If this were true then every receptacle installed would require a space of 30 inches wide and 36 inches deep around it with nothing projecting more than 6 inches past the finish cover. ...
I am not saying it is an oversight. I am saying that they won't accept reasonable wording. All electrical equipment is likely to be examined while energized, it really doesn't matter if electrical safe work rules say you can't do this. Even if you are using the correct PPE and are troubleshooting, you are still examining the energized electrical equipment and the rules in 110.26.
The issue is the code use of the words "all electrical equipment" and the Article 100 definition of equipment. Why not use the wording of 110.16(E)?
it does to me. If I find a business where I do not like the management, I do not use that business. I just assume that most people are like that.