Does Table 220.12 need updating?

Status
Not open for further replies.

finhead

Senior Member
Table 220.12 has not changed since at least 1975; none the less, the language of Section 220.12 is quite specific; "for occupancies specified therein shall constitute the minimum lighting load." If an occupancy is not listed in the table, for example a library or medical clinic, is it permissible for the AHJ to select a listed occupancy with a similar lighting level and require the same VA / sq ft?

For example: a clinic consisting of examination rooms, nurse station, and a reception area should have, it seems to me, a lighting level in the neighborhood of an office or bank and more than a dwelling. If T220.12 can not be applied to this occupancy, the lighting load would have to be calculated by the connected load - which is very often far less than the unit loads listed in the table.

Your thoughts are always appreciated,
Brian Dolan

PS - Does anyone know what an "Industrial commercial (loft) building is?
 
Finhead, I agree with you that table 220.12 could use some attention.
There are so many other buildings that are not mentioned besides a library or medical building such as a museum or zoo. I don't know why they singled out the particular building types they did. Unless they thought they had them all.
They possible could have added at the bottom of the table all others at ?va.

Maybe one of the moderaters has some thoughts on this subject.

Bowhunter
 
Larry

Loved the video. Those fish heads would probably be happy with less than 1/2 VA / sq ft of lighting.

Brian
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top