Does this look right!

[kwired]

I have never seen a wye primary, I know they exist, but that said, my overfilled brain thinks the common (grounded conductor) point on the Wye primary have to be isolated from the secondary. And a grounding conductor would be allowed to bond to the same primary termination point. So this can't be a Wye primary because it doesn't have a primary common

If you were to have a neutral conductor connected to a wye primary, you wouldn't want to connect an equipment grounding conductor to that point because that would potentially make your EGC and/or other objects bonded to it current carrying components carrying primary side neutral current.

 

[texie]

So this is my first time, there's a disagreement between an electrical engineer and a city electrical inspector ( and I'm stuck here in the Middle With You) about bonding and setup of this Transformer we chose the side of the inspector because we need our Green tag and to get on down the road.
Scared to death that I'm actually saying this to you guys.
But give me your opinionView attachment 15040

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

It's wrong, creates other code violations and potentially a hazard. I would not let an incompetent inspector bully me into this.

 

[alive wire]

It's wrong, creates other code violations and potentially a hazard. I would not let an incompetent inspector bully me into this.

Inspector knew it was wrong, just didn't know why

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

[alive wire]

If you were to have a neutral conductor connected to a wye primary, you wouldn't want to connect an equipment grounding conductor to that point because that would potentially make your EGC and/or other objects bonded to it current carrying components carrying primary side neutral current.

Kwired thank you for your contribution to this forum.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk