Dryer receptacle in bedroom

Status
Not open for further replies.
How do they get by if the dryer is Gas? I did not think a gas appliance that draws combustion air from the room be allowed in any bedroom.
 
How do they get by if the dryer is Gas? I did not think a gas appliance that draws combustion air from the room be allowed in any bedroom.

That is a building code mechanical question and not relevant to the electrical inspection.

Nothing prohibits it that I am aware of and I am also an IRC certified building inspector.
 
iwire said:
Only 125 volt 15 and 20 amp circuits.

A 120/240 circuit would not be required to be AFCI protected.

So if one were to wire a bedroom with all 120/240V circuits, then you would not need to use AFCI protection? :) :)

-Jon
 
winnie said:
So if one were to wire a bedroom with all 120/240V circuits, then you would not need to use AFCI protection? :) :)

-Jon

Those would not require AFCI protection.

But you would still need 120v receps. 210.52(A).
 
This is a good one,the dryer is allowed in the bedroom but does not require AFCI-protection.Is the dryer which can be the largest load in the house less prone to arc faults?Is this why it does not require AFCI protection?
 
jflynn said:
This is a good one,the dryer is allowed in the bedroom but does not require AFCI-protection.Is the dryer which can be the largest load in the house less prone to arc faults?Is this why it does not require AFCI protection?

The amp-draw for a given load has nothing to do with whether or not it's an arc-fault hazard.

I would not doubt in coming years you will, however, be required to have evry resi circuit on an arc-fault.

If you feel strongly about it, send in a submittal for the '11.... you have until November 7th, I believe. Forms are in the back of the '08.
 
480sparky said:
Those [120/240V circuits] would not require AFCI protection.But you would still need 120v receps. 210.52(A).
Right, but you could put the 120v receptacles on a 120/240V MWBC. It seems like a way to circumvent the AFCI requirement--run all circuits as MWBCs protected by double-pole breakers, and be sure to include a 120/240V outlet on each circuit.

Yours, Wayne
 
wwhitney said:
Right, but you could put the 120v receptacles on a 120/240V MWBC. It seems like a way to circumvent the AFCI requirement--run all circuits as MWBCs protected by double-pole breakers, and be sure to include a 120/240V outlet on each circuit.

Yours, Wayne

How does it circumvent the AFCI requirement??

If it is supplying power to a 125v 15a or 20a outlet it SHALL BE AFCI protected.

It does not matter if it is a MWBC or not.
 
480sparky said:
The amp-draw for a given load has nothing to do with whether or not it's an arc-fault hazard.

My point was no so much the the load of a given circuit,but the possibility of an arc-fault hazard still existing in an area that requires AFCI protection.Do you agree a dryer can produce arc-faults,?
 
jflynn said:
480sparky said:
The amp-draw for a given load has nothing to do with whether or not it's an arc-fault hazard.

My point was no so much the the load of a given circuit,but the possibility of an arc-fault hazard still existing in an area that requires AFCI protection.Do you agree a dryer can produce arc-faults,?

And a 30-amp 240-volt device in a bathroom can have a ground fault, but GFCI protection is not required. The code says what it says. Some things are required and some are not. Some things will be required in the future that are not today. Today's code says that AFCI is only required on 15 and 20 amp 120-volt outlets. Who knows what the next code will require?
 
roger3829 said:
How does it circumvent the AFCI requirement??
In the 2008 NEC, 210.12(B) starts off "All 120 volt, single phase, 15- and 20-ampere branch circuits supplying outlets . . ." If a MWBC supplies 120V outlets and a 240V outlet, is it still a "120 volt branch circuit"? I'm just thinking out loud here. :)

Edit to add: the wording in 2002 was clearer: "All branch circuits that supply 125-volt, single-phase, 15- and 20-ampere outlets . . .".

Cheers, Wayne
 
Last edited:
wwhitney said:
If a MWBC supplies 120V outlets and a 240V outlet, is it still a "120 volt branch circuit"? I'm just thinking out loud here. :)

Cheers, Wayne

Parts of it are. :smile:

If you can provide AFCI protection to just the 120 volt sections your good to go. :grin:
 
480sparky said:
jflynn said:
Yes, but why would it be more so just because it's in a bedroom and not down in the basement, or in the laundry room?


I/ll give you that,it just doesnt make sense to me,however as the senior member in post #32 mentions the code is the code,and it is compliant to install a dryer in a bedroom.We dont do alot of residential, so this is the first time I ever ran across this installation-I learn every day on this forum...
 
The only way to truly and completely understand the Code, IMPO, is to be part of the group of people who write it. And it's just not one group, there's several (look in the Codebook right after the table of contents).

The Book is so complex and intertwined that it's a major undertaking to make revisions. That's why it takes three years to make changes (now look at the pages right after the index)!

To get a better understanding of how the process works, I'd strongly suggest you contact the NFPA and request copies of the latest Report on Proposals (ROP) and Report on Committees (ROC). You can download the 14mb ROP here, and the 5.4mb ROC here if you like. Massive tomes, they are, the ROP weighing in at 998 pages, the ROC 681. If you wish, the NFPA can send you printed copies. Free, if I remember correctly.

With the complexity of the publication, combined with the fact that is produced by human beings, there's bound to be errors, mistakes, oversights, and typos. To correct those, the NFPA produces an Errata on occasion, so you don't have to purchase a complete reprinted Codebook to be up to date. Two pages of changes, and you can mark those in your current book in a matter of minutes.

For those of you who have the Codebook or Handbook on CD, I invite you to search for the phrase 'common sense' next time you launch it. I doubt it will appear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top