kwired
Electron manager
- Location
- NE Nebraska
That kind of shouldn't matter. same branch circuit isn't acceptable though.May be a dumb question, but how old is the house?
Could it be the dishwasher and ac are on the same feeder?
That kind of shouldn't matter. same branch circuit isn't acceptable though.May be a dumb question, but how old is the house?
Could it be the dishwasher and ac are on the same feeder?
Really is a matter of what should be changed, GFCI designs or designs of equipment that utilize high frequency high speed switching.The Original Post stated that the Heat Pump was changed ... so it is a High Efficiency unit and is causing the interference we have been talking about.
One advantage of RCD's is the common design for high-frequency noise, which Teslas wall chargers have used for years.Really is a matter of what should be changed, GFCI designs or designs of equipment that utilize high frequency high speed switching.
The same industry that leverage their NFPA code-panel appointments, to adopt 2-Pole GFCI's, AFCI's, and SPD's, will likely block RCD devices, with intellectual property owned by competitors.That and the fact NEC has overdone it in recent years IMO with some the GFCI requirements.. ..So guess who promotes these changes? Likely the GFCI manufacturers?
Adopting Assured Grounding at the appliance level would also solve broken Grounding prongs, often removed from the cord cap.Maybe a better solution is somehow making appliances that test for presence of an EGC and lock themselves out of operation if such tests fail?
UL 943 is working on that but expect an actual standard is still at least a couple of years away, than another year or two for the manufacturers to design, test, and produce a product.Really is a matter of what should be changed, GFCI designs or designs of equipment that utilize high frequency high speed switching.
...
Siemens may have circumvented that process by licensing RCD Tech for their 2-Pole GFCI, designed for problematic Pentair & Hayward VFD pool motors.UL 943 is working on that but expect an actual standard is still at least a couple of years away, than another year or two for the manufacturers to design, test, and produce a product.
I think there is someone else advertising that type of device also. As long as the device passes all of the requirements of UL 943, they can make any other design changes they want to their GFCIs. However, I don't think there was any specific re-design. I believe the fact that they functioned for the Pentair equipment was just found accidentally by the installers.Siemens may have circumvented that process by licensing RCD Tech for their 2-Pole GFCI, designed for problematic Pentair & Hayward VFD pool motors.
I see existing work with RCD's usually require an EGC connection to earth, and operate at 230v.What UL 943 is working on is one that will be called GFCI-HF to account for the high frequency leakage current issue.
Your post requires an un-secure download of a separate PDF file.I don't know how many of you have read my Post #8, but there are a lot of low income people that have been forgotten in all of this fiasco.
since when has NEC ever made rules based on cost of the installation? Well at least post WWII?I don't know how many of you have read my Post #8, but there are a lot of low income people that have been forgotten in all of this fiasco.
Actually the utility company paid for every hour we were there, and paid the bill for the EE with all the metering equipment.Is it also the 3rd time you worked for free?
Glad your back, please feel free to takes the topic where you left off.Actually the utility company paid for every hour we were there, and paid the bill for the EE with all the metering equipment.