"Electrician Trainee" cards, employee journeyman applications, and contractor liability

Ricko1980

Member
Location
San Francisco
Occupation
Electrical Contractor
Hi Folks,

We're in California, and I'm not sure how this works in other states. I'd particularly welcome advise from contractors in California.

We have trainees with "Electrician Trainee" cards, which in my opinion are a bit of a scam. You need them in order to work as a trainee for an electrical contractor here. This is since about 20 years ago. Before that it was permissible for contractors to have trainees without any official documentation, accruing experience hours and eventually getting licensed (but not needing to be an official "trainee" on some state list).

Anyone can get an "ET" card, you just have to enroll in some $350 online course four times a year, and keep enrolling until you are eligible to get the electrician license and pass the exam. The courses don't seem very valuable.

Contractors aren't allowed to employ people who don't have the "ET" card for anything that could come off as "making electrical connections." This is a bit of a gray area, and all of the smaller contractors I know around here have a mix of people with "ET" cards or without them. (Do the people doing supply runs need them? Do the people sweeping up? What about the people bending conduit or helping pull wire?)

I have an employee who is licensed in a foreign country, wants to validate his experience here in California. He says that he's been told to provide a letter from his current employer... but he doesn't have the ET card. I want to help this employee out, and rely on him continuing to work for me so want to be tactful, but I'm really reluctant to sign anything. I should have insisted he get an ET card already, and have tried to help him get one, but he only speaks Spanish so the options for online courses are limited. Since hiring this guy 2 years ago, I've been much more diligent about making sure that any and all trainees have the ET card and sign an agreement to maintain it in good standing.

My employee found a PDF (I can't find the source) with a sample letter for me to write to the Department of Industrial Relations, as well as a paragraph saying:

"Does this create any legal liability for the employer?
No. The DIR does not require the employer to legally certify the worker, nor does it hold the employer liable. The DIR only asks for an honest and verifiable letter confirming factual work experience.
The letter will not be made public, it is not used for any legal proceedings, and it carries no legal risk or obligation to the signer as long as it is based on truthful information."

Anyone have experience in this area and have any story to report about how the Department of Industrial Relations responded?
 
Anyone can get an "ET" card, you just have to enroll in some $350 online course four times a year, and keep enrolling until you are eligible to get the electrician license and pass the exam.
So, someone has to pay $1400 a year just to work as an apprentice? Who gets the money and who provides the online course? What does the course teach? Do plumbers have the same requirement?

-Hal
 
About a decade ago, I obtained what might have been called an "electrician trainee" license (I'm not sure what it was called) in Washington state. It would have allowed me to work as an electrician under the supervision of a journeyman electrician. My intent was to be able to do voluntary work on such projects as renovating a church. I never did work under that license.

Here's my point: I paid about $30 for the license (obtained online). That's all! If I wanted to renew it, I would have to have taken training classes. I believe I could have taken sufficient classes online for under $300. So the notion of an apprentice paying $1400 a year seems ludicrous to me.
 
...

I have an employee who is licensed in a foreign country, wants to validate his experience here in California. He says that he's been told to provide a letter from his current employer... but he doesn't have the ET card. I want to help this employee out, and rely on him continuing to work for me so want to be tactful, but I'm really reluctant to sign anything. I should have insisted he get an ET card already, and have tried to help him get one, but he only speaks Spanish so the options for online courses are limited. Since hiring this guy 2 years ago, I've been much more diligent about making sure that any and all trainees have the ET card and sign an agreement to maintain it in good standing.

My employee found a PDF (I can't find the source) with a sample letter for me to write to the Department of Industrial Relations, as well as a paragraph saying:

"Does this create any legal liability for the employer?
No. The DIR does not require the employer to legally certify the worker, nor does it hold the employer liable. The DIR only asks for an honest and verifiable letter confirming factual work experience.
The letter will not be made public, it is not used for any legal proceedings, and it carries no legal risk or obligation to the signer as long as it is based on truthful information."

Anyone have experience in this area and have any story to report about how the Department of Industrial Relations responded?

Please clarify. The employee is going for a contractor's license or an ET card, or journeyman's test? The letter is for DIR or CSLB?
 
Please clarify. The employee is going for a contractor's license or an ET card, or journeyman's test? The letter is for DIR or CSLB?
I think he just wants him to write a letter verifying how long he has worked for him and at what capacity. Imo
 
I think he just wants him to write a letter verifying how long he has worked for him and at what capacity. Imo
What good does that do for this employee since he didn't have an ET card and wouldn't be able to sit for the test because he didn't fulfill the requirements?

I can see that being applicable for a person who has an ET card, fulfilled the requirements and maybe is changing employers and wants to have a record of his previous employment.

-Hal
 
What good does that do for this employee since he didn't have an ET card and wouldn't be able to sit for the test because he didn't fulfill the requirements?

I can see that being applicable for a person who has an ET card, fulfilled the requirements and maybe is changing employers and wants to have a record of his previous employment.

-Hal
From what I can see on CA. DIR's site he needs a lot more than a letter....
I seen no workarounds to getting a license.
 
DIR handles certification, not licensing. These are different in California.
Oh, ok. I used to handle State certifications for my employer before I retired.
Cali is a whole nuther nut to crack on that.
We do transportable modular buildings.
 
Top