Hi Pierre! Actually 9'11" wouldn't be a violation, it just wouldn't be an "available electrode" We ask for a Ufer ground at all buildings and we have no objections at all.Originally posted by pierre:
Technically - 9feet, 11 inches is a violation. Common sense may be another thing. There is an 'old' saying - "give them an inch and they will take a foot".
How about a Ufer ground being mandatory on all new services, bonding the cold water to the system?
I'll be the first to admit that I'm not nearly as versed in electrical theory as you are. I ask for the concrete encased electrode for 2 reasons. (1) It is available. (2) We don't inspect the water lateral and have have no assurance that there is 10' of copper. With the increase in usage of plastic water piping, 10' of electrode happens less and less now.Originally posted by karl riley:
I'm curious about wanting a uffer. No objection, but if it is basically for lightning protection, why wouldn't a ground rod do the job? Karl
250.52 Grounding Electrodes.Technically - 9feet, 11 inches is a violation.
I do not think anything dissipates to the ground.Originally posted by pierre:
I was refering to Surge Arrestors (Art 280), But I think the principle for TVSS (Art 285) is basically the same. I was under the belief that they discharge to ground.