In ALL other repects the contactor set up is more reliable and fail safe.
Basically shunt trips are used as they are the cheapest way to get it done.
Personally I think they are unreliable due to the reasons already mentioned.
Like gadfly I think normally open contactors are a much better way to go. They self supervise themselves and the control circuit.
If cost was the only concern, 'undervoltage trip' coils are certainly more in line with shunt trips than are separate contactors.
If 'shunt trips' are so inherently unreliable, why do Medium Voltage breakers depend on them?
Jim, those MV instaltions have supervised battery backed up control circuits.
If the systems jap and I are talking about had those control systems I would not be saying that they are unreliable.
As far as costs I see it time and time again shunts are a cheaper instaltion than contractors for more reasons than the cost of the shunt
We were talking about the reliability of shunt trip versus contactor not the reliability of the control power.
JAP>
No I have been speaking of the system, if you look at my posts you will see I said shunts and contractors are equal as far as mechanical reliability.
Jim, those MV instaltions have supervised battery backed up control circuits.
If the systems jap and I are talking about had those control systems I would not be saying that they are unreliable.
As far as costs I see it time and time again shunts are a cheaper instaltion than contractors for more reasons than the cost of the shunt
OK I give up
I still install shunt systems but will never be convinced they are as reliable without control circuit supervison.
I also would like to add after thinking about it that it takes micro seconds for electricity to travel whereas breaker shunt trips take what 1/2 to a second? This can be 1,000 times faster. So now I feel better.