Fact or Fiction!?

Status
Not open for further replies.
davedottcom said:
2 Unused spaces must be left available in every panel?

As far as I know the NEC makes no provisions for future expansion.


What good would an unused spaced be unless some one was going to use it and then it wouldn't be an unused space. ( Catch 22 ). :grin:
 
Article 90.8 Wiring Planning. Part A Future expansion and convience mentions some items about your topic.
 
What good would an unused spaced be unless some one was going to use it and then it wouldn't be an unused space. ( Catch 22 ). :grin:

Excellent Point!
:D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have worked solely on the design side of the fence for Industrial Clients and invaribly it is written 25% spare space at commisioning be available for plant growth. It is not a NEC requirment to my knowledge(which is limited)

dick
 
growler said:
( Catch 22 ). :grin:
Catch 22 doesn't exist!
Hmm...I've been called on that before. Now that's really making me wonder. I guess I'll have to make sure I get a code citation next time.

Maybe we should start employing the lessons taught in that book. The unwritten rule (catch 22) is they can do anything they want, as long as you put up with it. We should stop putting up with it, every time!:grin:
 
I have filled panels without hesitation, such as in townhouses and apartments where the odds are astronomical that an additional circuit would ever be added, and it's never been an issue.
 
LarryFine said:
I have filled panels without hesitation, such as in townhouses and apartments where the odds are astronomical that an additional circuit would ever be added, and it's never been an issue.


So it's been you all these years......
 
billisa67 said:
Article 90.8 Wiring Planning. Part A Future expansion and convience mentions some items about your topic.


But is anything in Article 90 enforceable?
 
infinity said:
But is anything in Article 90 enforceable?

Gawd, I sure hope so. Otherwise, FPNs become mandatory. Soft conversions go out the window. The terms shall and shall not will be hotly debated. And the NEC becomes a design manual for untrained persons.
 
480sparky said:
Gawd, I sure hope so. Otherwise, FPNs become mandatory. Soft conversions go out the window.

IMO you can not 'enforce' information which is all Article 90 contains.

It's like saying you can enforce a math book.
 
480sparky said:
Gawd, I sure hope so. Otherwise, FPNs become mandatory. Soft conversions go out the window. The terms shall and shall not will be hotly debated. And the NEC becomes a design manual for untrained persons.

Ken, there is no wording in the introduction that is a rule.

The style manual points out that article 90 is just an introduction with administrative provisions and the following chapters contain the code requirements. The introduction explains what FPN's, shall, shall not, etc... are and how they are used in the code chapters


CHAPTER 2 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE AND NUMBERING
2.1 Subdivisions of the NEC. The National Electrical Code shall be organized as follows.

2.1.1 Introduction. Article 90 contains the scope of the NEC and administrative provisions.

2.1.2 Chapters. Chapters are major subdivisions of the NEC that cover broad areas and are divided into articles. Chapters shall be organized as follows:

Chapter 1 General
Article 100 — Definitions
Article 110 — Requirements for Electrical Installations
Chapter 2 Wiring and Protection
Articles 200 – 299
Chapter 3 Wiring Methods
Articles 300 – 399
Chapter 4 Equipment for General Use
Articles 400 – 499
Chapter 5 Special Occupancies
Articles 500 – 599
Chapter 6 Special Equipment
Articles 600 – 699
Chapter 7 Special Conditions
Articles 700 – 799
Chapter 8 Communications Systems
Articles 800 – 899
Chapter 9 Tables

2.1.3 Articles. Articles are chapter subdivisions that cover a specific subject such as grounding, overcurrent protection, lighting fixtures, and so on. Each article shall have a title. Articles are divided into sections and sometimes into parts.


Roger
[FONT=EJOLHI+TimesNewRoman]
[/FONT]
 
90.1(B) Adequacy. This code contains provisions that are considered necessary for safety. Compliance therewith and proper maintenance results in an installation that is essentially free from hazard but not necessarily effecient, convenient, or adequate for good service or future expansion of electrical use.
 
Just to be contrary, if 90.2 Scope (A) Covered is not enforcable, then if I tell the inspector that the extra receptacles, light fixutres, and hot tub we added to my cousin's double-wide mobile home is not covered by the code, then how can he enforce an inspection of said mobile home?
 
crossman said:
then how can he enforce an inspection of said mobile home?

The NEC has nothing to do with inspections. :grin:

Beyond that you will never enforce 90.2 you will enforce the rest of the code.
 
Hmmmm....

okay, here is another...

90.9(C)(4) Safety. Where a negative impact on safety would result, soft conversion shall be used.

Inspector: "Hmmm... that installation does not look safe to me."

EC: "Really? I used hard conversion when making the calculation for that."

Inspector: "Oh, you did? Well I feel you should have used a soft conversion in the interest of safety. You are in violation of the NEC."

EC: "Could you please give a Code reference for that violation of using hard conversion where I should have used soft conversion?"

Inspector: "90.9(C)(4) = RED TAG!" <Inspector slaps bright red sticker on panel and gleefully struts across the parking lot to his car, chuckling to himself all the while>
 
Take look at 90.3,

Article 90 is an introduction and Chapters 1 and above apply generally or specifically.

No mention of the introduction applying generally.

I rarely say never but IMO there will never be a legitimate red tag that starts 90.
 
crossman said:
Inspector: "90.9(C)(4) = RED TAG!" <Inspector slaps bright red sticker on panel and gleefully struts across the parking lot to his car, chuckling to himself all the while>

And although you probably wouldn't, this is a perfect case of where you should contest the ruling in that 90.9 or any other part of 90 is not a mandatory code rule.

If you were reading a novel the introduction sets up the story and is informing the reader of special definitions, landscapes, areas, etc..., but it is not the story or even a chapter, this is exactly what is pointed out in the style manual.



Roger
 
We have used small Sub-Panels which have more 'spaces' than you should utilize due to overloading possibilities. These 'extra spaces' have CB mounting which will not accept a CB.

GE makes a panel rated at 125A, which has these odd mounts which can't be used, (unless you grind the tabs off). These panels at 125A were 12/16 ckt years back, and now are maybe 8/16.

There is a good reason for limiting the number of CB in a panel!

I've seen a GE 125A panel of this style, with 16 half-size CB installed.
There were 12x20A(120v) and 2x30A (240v).
The Main Breaker was a 70A,
and the service was a very old 60A Residential.

Could this be where the rumor started?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top