When my daughter was buying a house a few years back, the HI report had a note to the effect that the GFCI in the garage should be removed in case she want to put a freezer out there
That's when you install a GFCI with a trip alarm.
When my daughter was buying a house a few years back, the HI report had a note to the effect that the GFCI in the garage should be removed in case she want to put a freezer out there
The problem with the Home Inspector SCAM is their contract with their sucker (I mean client) is that they're not responsible for any of the drivel they promulgate or any of the glaring defects that they fail to notice.
Exactly, and to make matters worse mortgage companies and insurers take there reports as gospel, insisting on remediation to qualify, even on items that were code compliant at time of installation. We (as electricians or electrical inspectors) are obliged to accept prior compliant installation even if it no longer meeting code, but a HI (who has no real knowledge of what they are looking at) can make an unsubstantiated claim and most homeowners will fall over themselves to "fix" the HI's complaint to satiate the bank or insurer.The problem with the Home Inspector SCAM is their contract with their sucker (I mean client) is that they're not responsible for any of the drivel they promulgate or any of the glaring defects that they fail to notice.
Better to get a freezer temperature alarm. GFCI tripping is just one way that the food can go bad. I've more often had the open.That's when you install a GFCI with a trip alarm.
That's when you install a GFCI with a trip alarm.
I like to call those gas lines - copper is acceptable for LPThe thing is, she has never owned a freezer anyway.
It’s bad enough when an HI calls out perfectly acceptable stuff as being bad, but when he tells you to make a change that creates a real violation, that’s another level of bad!
On the same inspection, he missed the copper tubing run through the floor feeding the range!
They have a certain usefulness but below is where there is a problem:Those who defend HIs keep bringing up "its not a code inspection"
They generally are not experts in any field of what they are all inspecting. Just someone that takes a look and makes a list of things that may be questionable and should be referred to experts to determine if further actions are a necessity.Exactly, and to make matters worse mortgage companies and insurers take there reports as gospel, insisting on remediation to qualify, even on items that were code compliant at time of installation. We (as electricians or electrical inspectors) are obliged to accept prior compliant installation even if it no longer meeting code, but a HI (who has no real knowledge of what they are looking at) can make an unsubstantiated claim and most homeowners will fall over themselves to "fix" the HI's complaint to satiate the bank or insurer.
Those who defend HIs keep bringing up "its not a code inspection"
to make matters worse mortgage companies and insurers take there reports as gospel, insisting on remediation to qualify,