feeder schedule

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

rose1981

Member
Location
TX
Should I size the cables based on the over current protective device rating as per feeder schedule attached? or do a voltage drop calculation to size the conductors?
 

Attachments

  • feeder schedule.jpg
    feeder schedule.jpg
    71.5 KB · Views: 72
Hello rose1981, I think you still have to check it for verification, see attached. Per table the sizes are "based on the rating of the overcurrent protective device." To compensate for voltage drop (more than 100ft), we need to upsize the feeders.
 

Attachments

  • feeder sched1.jpg
    feeder sched1.jpg
    114.6 KB · Views: 38
  • feeder sched2.jpg
    feeder sched2.jpg
    50.9 KB · Views: 27
jojo said:
Hello rose1981, I think you still have to check it for verification, see attached. Per table the sizes are "based on the rating of the overcurrent protective device." To compensate for voltage drop (more than 100ft), we need to upsize the feeders.
Click to expand...

My mistake, let me rephrase. My words are confusing:) What I mean is we size the cable based on the attached feeder schedule (i.e. as a minimum, conductor shall match with the overcurrent protection device). But if the load is more than 100ft, we upsize the feeder to compensate for voltage drop.
 
rose1981 said:
Should I size the cables based on the over current protective device rating as per feeder schedule attached? or do a voltage drop calculation to size the conductors?
Click to expand...

Generally the OCPD size wouldn't change even if the conductor were sized larger for VD compensation.

For example, say you need a 200 amp feeder for a 200 amp panelboard which would typically be #3/0, if you up-sized to 600 kcmil for an extra long distance then the feeder would still be a 200 amp feeder making the OCPD would then be 200 amps. In this example the panelboard is only rated for 200 amps so even though you have larger conductors you cannot exceed the 200 rating of the panelboard.
 
If you increase conductor size because of voltage drop reasons, but leave overcurrent protection the same, then you must increase the equipment grounding conductor size proportionally to what you increased the ungrounded conductor sizes. This is pretty clearly stated in 250.122(B).
 
The sequence of design steps should go as follows:
  1. Calculate the load.
  2. Select a conductor size that has sufficient ampacity for that load.
  3. Select an overcurrent protection device that can protect that conductor size.
  4. Check for voltage drop issues, and decide whether to upsize the conductors and the EGC.

The feeder schedule can be a handy tool for step 2. But it can give you an incorrect EGC size if you use it for upsizing for VD. You may have to calculate the upsized EGC manually.
 
If someone gives you a drawing that already has the OCPD and wire sizes on it, why would you think it is your job to change them, unless you are being paid to proof them, other than for obvious mistakes like typos, or undersized wires.
 
petersonra said:
If someone gives you a drawing that already has the OCPD and wire sizes on it, why would you think it is your job to change them, unless you are being paid to proof them, other than for obvious mistakes like typos, or undersized wires.
Click to expand...

The burden should be on the engineer to provide length estimates that are realistic for the project, for the major feeders, and provide the comprehensive feeder specification accounting for both voltage drop and local factors.

The engineer cannot always predict the path length. So if you take a path that is much more serpentine, far exceeding the length that the engineer predicted, then either know how to upsize it yourself, or ask for clarification.
 
infinity said:
Generally the OCPD size wouldn't change even if the conductor were sized larger for VD compensation.

For example, say you need a 200 amp feeder for a 200 amp panelboard which would typically be #3/0, if you up-sized to 600 kcmil for an extra long distance then the feeder would still be a 200 amp feeder making the OCPD would then be 200 amps. In this example the panelboard is only rated for 200 amps so even though you have larger conductors you cannot exceed the 200 rating of the panelboard.
Click to expand...

In that example, you'd probably have to make a terminal adaptation as well.
 
petersonra said:
If someone gives you a drawing that already has the OCPD and wire sizes on it, why would you think it is your job to change them, unless you are being paid to proof them, other than for obvious mistakes like typos, or undersized wires.
Click to expand...
Because many engineers make drawings or project spec's that have a disclaimer in them putting Code compliance on the contractor. While voltage drop isn't a Code compliance issue, making certain voltage drop will not degrade equipment operation and such is something a conscientious contractor/electrician will do if there are no indications of a comprehensive analysis has been done (IMO).
 
jojo said:
Hello rose1981, I think you still have to check it for verification, see attached. Per table the sizes are "based on the rating of the overcurrent protective device." To compensate for voltage drop (more than 100ft), we need to upsize the feeders.
Click to expand...
What I'd like to know is how you know Table 3.75 and the notes thereto are the same on rose1981's project when you are a half a world away??? :D
 
Smart $ said:
What I'd like to know is how you know Table 3.75 and the notes thereto are the same on rose1981's project when you are a half a world away??? :D
Click to expand...

Hello Smart $, even if Im a half world away were still in the same page in one way or another. Im working in a US based company here, hehehe ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top