blackdog2 said:In raceway. Am I correct in assuming that even though the conductor does have a 90 degree C rating, we must still use the 75 degree column (310.16). With the temperature correction, we would have the 500 KCMIL derated to .88 of the listed value or 334 amperes.
AlWired said:In the original post, what does "THHN/THWN" mean? THHN is from the 90 degree column. THWN is from the 75 degree column. The replies to the original post all referenced 90 degree insulation.
T = ThermoplasticAlWired said:In the original post, what does "THHN/THWN" mean? THHN is from the 90 degree column. THWN is from the 75 degree column. The replies to the original post all referenced 90 degree insulation.
I agree with your concerns.whitlow said:For a 90C, 480v conductor in conduit in a 40C ambient attached to 75C terminations, it seems like we are saying the ampacity could be either the 90C rating derated for ambient temp, or the 75C rating with no derating. For a #6 wire, for example, we could have
(1) 75 A (the 90C rating) X 0.91 = 68 A., or
(2) 65 A (the 75C rating).
Since 65 is the lower of the two, we would say that the ampacity of this conductor is 65 A. Am I correct?
The thing that bothers me is that this would allow the operating temperature of the conductor to exceed the temperature rating of the termination. If this conductor carries 65 A in conduit (possibly just a few inches from the termination) in a 30C ambient, (according to Table 310.16) the conductor will operate at a temperature of about 75C. If the ambient temp is 40C instead of 30C, then the operating temp of the conductor will be higher than 75C, and this will exceed the rating of the termination. Can someone explain the logic that the NEC followed in apparently allowing the wire temp to exceed the termination rating.
It may be because air can move due to convection, while the water, once heated, stays around the conductors. For the first few minutes, the water sinks heat, but then it just sits there. That's my theory, anyway.Dennis Alwon said:I have always wondered why the conductor is rated lower for wet location. It would seem the opposite to me.
LarryFine said:It may be because air can move due to convection, while the water, once heated, stays around the conductors. For the first few minutes, the water sinks heat, but then it just sits there. That's my theory, anyway.