Seeking input...AHJ is allowing what I suspect may be a NEC violation. Am removing existing 200 Amp overhead utility service to CSED ("all-in-one"?). Installing new 200 Amp CSED and overhead service, 22 kW generator, and 200 Amp ATS. Existing CSED to be fed from ATS. Existing CSED neutral appears to have integral bond; branch circuit grounding and neutral conductors are terminated on same ground bars.
I proposed installing new insulated neutral bar kits in existing all in one, connected to bonded neutral in new CSED. with all existing branch neutrals terminated on new insulated neutral bars (leaving grounding conductors on existing ground bars). In that scenario,
neutral in new all in one would be grounded, abd bond at existing all in one would be elimimated.
AHJ will accept leaving existing all in one as-is (neutral bonded), fed from new all in one.
Seems to me that would create a parallel neutral path between old & new all in one.
TIA for input.
I proposed installing new insulated neutral bar kits in existing all in one, connected to bonded neutral in new CSED. with all existing branch neutrals terminated on new insulated neutral bars (leaving grounding conductors on existing ground bars). In that scenario,
neutral in new all in one would be grounded, abd bond at existing all in one would be elimimated.
AHJ will accept leaving existing all in one as-is (neutral bonded), fed from new all in one.
Seems to me that would create a parallel neutral path between old & new all in one.
TIA for input.