Flash Protection

Status
Not open for further replies.

woodduder

Senior Member
Location
West Central FL.
Per the 2002 NEC 110.16 a marking for ARC FLASH HAZARD is required to be clearly visible. Our (new) local inspector is requiring us to place a sticker to the outside of the panelboard lid even though the manufacturer has placed this sticker on the back of this lid (hinged door). The inspector claims that this location is not clearly visible. I disagree. Please provide your opinion.
 
If you read the section carefully it states, "...shall be FIELD marked to warn...."

The label installed by the manufacturer does not meet this requirement.
 
It says: "The marking shall be located so as to be clearly visible to qualified persons before examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance of the equipment".

Now I would say that it could be on the dead front, but it's a fairly gray definition and as we concluded at the Southwestern Section meeting, there are no gray areas.

I would place it where the inspector wants it and get my job signed off.
 
I think the "field marked" requirement is wishful thinking that someone will do an arc flash calculation and put the results on the panelboard. But it doesn't require such a calculation.

If opening the front door doesn't expose any live parts, I don't see a problem with putting a field installed label on the inside of the door.
 
There is no offical decison on where warning labels must be placed. Many manufacturers and customers place their labels on the last panel/dead front before access to the hazard. This rational has led to some equipment requiring multiple lables (i.e. multiple section switchboards).
 
Based on the last two code cycles and some of the approved proposals submitted for the 2008 NEC, the code seems to be looking more like the NFPA 70E or an OSHA document. Safe working practices are not within the scope of the NEC yet many recent code changes are an attempt to create that protection. I'm not sure how effective the 110.16 requirement is or will be in the future but that consideration doesn't necessarily go into whether or not it should be enforced. A 40-cent sticker is by no means a hardship and can be easily applied at time of installation.

That being said, when you are unaware of how a particular jurisdiction or individual inspector interprets a particular code requirement, it is always best to contact that person or department for guidance rather than ignore advisories or argue the case on Final Inspection.

Whom you might believe to be "green" inspector or just a hard-liner may in truth be quite experienced and highly educated or is just following a consensus made within his department and not taking some rogue stance as you might believe. For example, the head of my building department, the inspections division manager, and three of the four electrical inspectors were all licensed electrical contractors before employment at the City. Many of the "gray" issues in the code have been carefully reviewed and discussed as a group to come up with the most appropriate enforcement policies and procedures for these installations.

In the event our vast experience, education, and training leaves us short of answers, we actively participate in our local IAEI and BOAF meetings to consult other local jurisdictions for their opinions and expertise. In some cases, one or more area building departments view things the same way. But this is not always the case and you the electrical contractor need to be aware of these local differences in enforcement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top