In Florida I have a building (middle of the three) contractor license, roofing and hvac and I am a mechanical eng. I am aware of the meter list. That one is from 2023 and the latest one is from around March 2025. If you were to look at the list, there are no 600 amp single phase meter cans. And as I explained in my post after many many months, I’m at the stage of converting the making and model meter can that I mentioned in my post from three phase to single phase. Because there is only one listed in all of the applicable meter materials as single phase, and it happens to be incorrect. So again, I’m trying to focus on the meter can issue and how to convert it from three phase to single phase because that’s the step that I want to make sure it is done correctly and there seems to be some difference of opinion. Thank you.
FPL - 600 amp service
- Thread starter LAT
- Start date
- Status
zbang
Senior Member
- Location
- Roughly 5346 miles from Earls Court
My objective is to obtain accurate and technically specific information regarding the conversion of a meter can to support a 600-amp single-phase service configuration. The question is narrowly focused on solutions within that scope.
Based on your response, it appears you are requesting that I enumerate multiple examples to support the context of my inquiry—examples which, in my professional experience, are widely recognized within the electrical industry and generally accepted by those familiar with service installations and power distribution. These scenarios are not obscure or hypothetical; they are commonplace in field applications across both residential and commercial settings.
Furthermore, if you are unaware, I must respectfully point out that the electrical power industry—whether involving utility interfaces, service equipment, or field modifications—has a documented history of injuries and fatalities, affecting both civilians and licensed professionals for many reasons. This is not a matter of opinion or anecdote but of public record and regulatory concern. That context is precisely why clarity, accuracy, and relevance in technical discussions are essential.
That said, much of this information is accessible through standard technical literature, trade publications, or through a brief online search using widely available tools such as Google.
Again, my objective is to obtain accurate and technically specific information regarding the conversion of a meter can to support a 600-amp single-phase service configuration.
Thank you.
zbang
Senior Member
- Location
- Roughly 5346 miles from Earls Court
That's wonderful, please answer the question or retract the statement. (The issue is that you brought a lot more into the conversation than just wiring the meter socket and then made some assertions which seem unsupported, it's up to you now to support them.)
As I clearly stated in my original post, “I have received conflicting information.” As a example, the link you provided appears to include meter cans, but none of them are designed for 600-amp single-phase service—presenting them as if they resolve the issue oversimplifies what is, in fact, a specialized application.
Further, your assertion that I have already been given definitive guidance on “the way they want it wired”—and your implication that my continued participation here is arbitrary or without purpose—is both unfounded and unconstructive. Let me be unequivocal: my engagement in this forum is intentional, informed, and driven by the pursuit of precise, actionable information regarding the conversion of a meter enclosure to support a 600-amp single-phase electrical service.
This is not an abstract or academic inquiry. It is a real-world challenge with direct implications for public safety and long-term system performance.
Many previous contributions have been thoughtful and technically sound, and I value those insights. However, when dealing with high-current installations, utility coordination, and life-safety risk factors, ambiguity must be addressed with diligence. Seeking additional clarification or peer review in such contexts is not only reasonable—it is essential.
I recognize that some of the information I am seeking may be well understood within certain professionals. That said, assuming uniformity of knowledge, experience, or jurisdictional requirements among all participants is both unrealistic and unsafe.
Accordingly, I respectfully urge that this discussion remain centered on the technical aspects of the issue. If anyone is able to provide informed, substantiated input—particularly from firsthand field experience or utility coordination—it would be most appreciated. I remain fully open to collaboration and thank all who are contributing in good faith to a fact-based, safety-oriented dialogue. Thank you.
I find it difficult to understand why you appear to dispute information that is generally regarded as common knowledge within the electrical and utility industries. While I fully acknowledge the value of rigorous inquiry, it seems that even if I were to present dissertation-level substantiation, further demands for validation would continue. Nevertheless, I have provided ten citations, all drawn from publicly available sources spanning the past several decades. These references are not intended to be exhaustive or to account for every incident, injury, or fatality associated with electrical and utility work; rather, they are illustrative examples highlighting the seriousness and relevance of the matter under discussion.
Let me emphasize unequivocally that I hold utility workers in the highest esteem. They perform extraordinary, dangerous work that is fundamental to the operation of our nation’s infrastructure. The expertise, resilience, and commitment they demonstrate—especially under extreme weather conditions and in the face of significant public pressure—deserve the utmost respect. I extend that same regard to electricians, whose technical proficiency and dedication to safety are essential to the proper functioning of our built environment.
To be clear, this discussion is not a critique of field technicians, linemen, or other skilled tradespeople. The ongoing confusion surrounding this issue does not originate at the ground level. Rather, it stems from inconsistent guidance, administrative opacity, and a lack of unified communication at the executive level. That breakdown in direction is what has created unnecessary complexity and uncertainty for those of us working to implement safe solutions.
As I noted in my initial post, I am at the end of a long and frustrating process. At this stage, I am simply trying to resolve the remaining issue regarding the appropriate meter issue for a 600-amp single-phase service.
My objective remains unchanged: to obtain precise, technically sound information that supports safety. I remain open to constructive input and sincerely appreciate all thoughtful and informed contributions to this discussion.
I am not sure how to explain this in simpler terms: I am dealing with conflicting information—that is, receiving multiple, differing responses concerning the exact same issue from the exact same utility. I do not understand why you do not perceive that issue. Part of the complication arises from the fact that the utility governs one portion of the installation, while the municipality oversees another. Just because you have not encountered an issue does not mean the issue cannot exist.
The core of my inquiry is this: what specific information, wiring scenarios, and real-world examples have others encountered when navigating this situation? Clarifying these experiences is critical to resolving the inconsistencies and ensuring a compliant and safe installation.
- Location
- New Jersey
- Occupation
- Journeyman Electrician
Afters some discussion several of the moderators agreed that this thread should be closed. When the thread begins without naming the POCO and there is no posted documentation of the conflicting information there is nothing more to discuss. As a reminder to everyone in the future please try to provide all of the relevant information up front so that this isn't a guessing game.
If for some legal reason you cannot post the actual conflicting information that they have given you we cannot help you due to forum rules regarding legal matters.
If for some legal reason you cannot post the actual conflicting information that they have given you we cannot help you due to forum rules regarding legal matters.
Last edited:
- Status