Geoffrey Lyons
Member
Is the use of fuse reducers an accepted practice or are they not up to par, half a...n it ????
Geoffrey Lyons said:Is the use of fuse reducers an accepted practice or are they not up to par, half a...n it ????
iwire said:We used to do work for a large retail chain that specified fusible switch gear and every bucket was ordered one size larger then needed, so in a brand new installation every bucket had fuse reducers in it. :-?
I think they work fine. I know some places prefer larger sized switches, just like many places prefer not to use the smallest NEMA size starters.infinity said:I would think that a listed product (fuse reducers) when installed properly would work just like the larger size fuse made for the specific gap.
OTOH, if you are not sure of the exact size of your load at the time you have to submit a plan, oversizing it makes some sense.barclayd said:Would someone seriously consider using a 400A switch for a 125A circuit?
Or even a 175A? I'm sorry, I do not see any economic benefit to an owner.
Designing to purposely have to use Fuse Reducers for new work would be like designing a new conduit run saying "Don't use a 4-11/16 box, use a 4 sq with an extension."
It does, however, give lots of opportunity for the dreaded "V A L U E E N G I N E E R I N G". BU-WHA-HA-HA-HA
Maybe that's why they do it.
Anyway - Fuse Reducers work great - never had a problem.
A lot of specs handle this by not allowing < 3/4" conduit to be used (for 30 to 60).barclayd said:If you don't know the loads by the time you get submittals, there just might be some other problems with the entire project.
30 to 60 - maybe/maybe not.
Anything else - (I'm not really from Missouri) I'm from Missouri, show me.
Just curious, though - would you also have to upsize your conduit to take advantage of the larger switch?
"OTOH" I had to look that up - it's from 'Fiddler on the Roof'
I thought it meant 'Only Throw Over Hand' (had the Hand part right)
db