But still, you see it in systems that were AC when brand new at the time.
Did my pics come through btw?
I've got a series of your posts that I have only glanced at that have images.
I wanted to say, in my reading of the early Code (1890s thru about 1913), I was struck by the language describing generators, and whether, and how, to connect them to Earth. Attention was given to floating generator and motor frames. I believe this was a first attempt at an economic use of materials to deliver power while not exposing people to the electricity. As a concept, one might be beguiled by it, without a working knowledge of the interconnected-ness of the bulk of normally-non-energized-conductive-surfaces, especially through Earth, and how little current it takes to stop a heartbeat.
There is, in fact, a good argument that introducing the EGC into a wood, plaster-and-lathe dwelling, built of almost entirely un-conductive materials that are normally kept dry, introduces an increase in electrical hazard. But that is not directly answering your query.
I believe that in those early days of the build out of the Tesla / Westinghouse AC distribution systems, the perceived safety benefit of protecting the neutral from overheating by limiting the current with an overcurrent protective device, was the goal. Insulation, itself, was still in the midst of development, and many were not reliable in tolerating much warmth.
In my work area, with housing stock predating electricity, I have found all manner of K&T service centers that have a history of fused neutrals. Some, a small number, have even survived to the present with the neutrals still fused.