mivey
Senior Member
Probably not a bad one in most cases.assumption
Probably not a bad one in most cases.assumption
The pdf in the same post? Must be some missing pages.to you
link was previously posted
Or just use the actual conductor sizes rather than complicate the issue?yep
should have used the same number of cables
interpolating between 2/0 and 3/0 for the 95 and 1 and 2 for the 50
to you
link was previously posted
Ingenieur said:isc" = V/(sqrt3 X"d)
isc' = V/X'd
I have the nec which is based on awgOr just use the actual conductor sizes rather than complicate the issue?
I can only surmise that the subject matter has confused youThe best I can figure is that you have confused yourself or do not understand what you are doing and just copy/pasting some stuff you read somewhere.
your post:
is wrong. The pdf linked does not state that and I would be suprised if it did. The correct formulas are:
isc" = V/(sqrt3 X"d)
isc' = V/(sqrt3 X'd)
or in p.u. reactance:
isc" = I/X"d
isc' = I/X'd
Probably not a bad one in most cases.
Not clear.
Where is your link stating E/X'd? Where is it using a different voltage?
The DC component should be higher at isc'' because it will have less asymmetric decay than isc' (which is taken to be later in the fault). A conservative value to size equipment is to use 2X for the DC offset at isc''.
How about you just show where your link stated what you posted. Perhaps I keep reading over it. Page and paragraph would help me find it.I can only surmise that the subject matter has confused you
are you actually a licensed graduate engineer?
no need to be defensive or to feel inferior and lash out
the link does state that
you are wrong now and will be again
it's ok
Maybe. Only the OP can say. When someone looks up the generator X'd it is almost always in the same place as the X''d. Very few exceptions.except in this case
Let me save you the trouble of looking because you are not going to find it.I can only surmise that the subject matter has confused you
are you actually a licensed graduate engineer?
no need to be defensive or to feel inferior and lash out
the link does state that
you are wrong now and will be again
it's ok
How about you just show where your link stated what you posted. Perhaps I keep reading over it. Page and paragraph would help me find it.
Let me save you the trouble of looking because you are not going to find it.
The known electrical engineering world uses I=E/X (for negligent values of R). Not sure where you get your info but you need to refresh your recollection.
I had to wait till I got in because I could not remember the general formula format for sudden faults for a generator but it is:
I = E/Xd + (E/X'd - E/Xd)e^(-t/T'd) + (E/X''d - E/Xd)e^(-t/T''d)
Note the similarity for the transient and subtransient portions.
A /sqrt(3) term would be a voltage coversion from L-L to L-G voltage and would apply to both transient and subtransient equations.
As I stated before, your prior formulas are incorrect. Look it up.
take it up with the author in the link
the 3 term equation is in a link posted in the other fault thread
The "AIC Calculations & It's Significance" thread? One of your posts?
Well, not there either that I could find. At any rate, there are three possibilities:The "AIC Calculations & It's Significance" thread? One of your posts?
The paper by Dr Jaffari? Nice paper.the first link ref is in this thread
the second in a post I made in the thread you ref, it's title 'fault current calculations'
as you seem to have concluded.isc" = V/(sqrt3 X"d) and isc' = V/X'd
I'' = Eg / X''d
I' = Eg / X'd
I = Eg / Xd
Hay… I have 3 generator's feed MSB , etch generator have S=925 KVA, X’d=27.1%, I need to calculate 3 phase short circuit in generator and in MSB for 3 generator's , the length between generator and MSB is 100m , and cable is A=8*(3*95+50)mm2.
Pleas help