Generator short circuit.

Status
Not open for further replies.

mivey

Senior Member
to you
link was previously posted

The best I can figure is that you have confused yourself or do not understand what you are doing and just copy/pasting some stuff you read somewhere.

your post:
Ingenieur said:
isc" = V/(sqrt3 X"d)
isc' = V/X'd

is wrong. The pdf linked does not state that and I would be suprised if it did. The correct formulas are:

isc" = V/(sqrt3 X"d)
isc' = V/(sqrt3 X'd)

or in p.u. reactance:

isc" = I/X"d
isc' = I/X'd
 

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
The best I can figure is that you have confused yourself or do not understand what you are doing and just copy/pasting some stuff you read somewhere.

your post:


is wrong. The pdf linked does not state that and I would be suprised if it did. The correct formulas are:

isc" = V/(sqrt3 X"d)
isc' = V/(sqrt3 X'd)

or in p.u. reactance:

isc" = I/X"d
isc' = I/X'd
I can only surmise that the subject matter has confused you
are you actually a licensed graduate engineer?
no need to be defensive or to feel inferior and lash out
the link does state that
you are wrong now and will be again
it's ok
 
Last edited:

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
Not clear.

Where is your link stating E/X'd? Where is it using a different voltage?

The DC component should be higher at isc'' because it will have less asymmetric decay than isc' (which is taken to be later in the fault). A conservative value to size equipment is to use 2X for the DC offset at isc''.

yes, 2 is conservative but not real

peaking factor
n = R/X0 = resist/surge imped
surge imped is sqrt(L/C) and since L > C in most t&d lines n ~1.5
the extra 0.5 may add 33% to the aic for no good reason
if you have ckt parameters n can be looked up on graphs for various systems

a fault is no more than a switching operation
close switch on sc
open switch, ie, cb trips

the dc decay is of the form ~ e^-(t/TC) ignoring damping
so yes, it will be less at 3 TC vs 1
TC = L/R or RC depending on what you are looking at
TC ....%
0.1 90%
0.5 60%
1 37%
3 5%
 

mivey

Senior Member
I can only surmise that the subject matter has confused you
are you actually a licensed graduate engineer?
no need to be defensive or to feel inferior and lash out
the link does state that
you are wrong now and will be again
it's ok
How about you just show where your link stated what you posted. Perhaps I keep reading over it. Page and paragraph would help me find it.
 

mivey

Senior Member
I can only surmise that the subject matter has confused you
are you actually a licensed graduate engineer?
no need to be defensive or to feel inferior and lash out
the link does state that
you are wrong now and will be again
it's ok

How about you just show where your link stated what you posted. Perhaps I keep reading over it. Page and paragraph would help me find it.
Let me save you the trouble of looking because you are not going to find it.

The known electrical engineering world uses I=E/X (for negligent values of R). Not sure where you get your info but you need to refresh your recollection.

I had to wait till I got in because I could not remember the general formula format for sudden faults for a generator but it is:

I = E/Xd + (E/X'd - E/Xd)e^(-t/T'd) + (E/X''d - E/Xd)e^(-t/T''d)

Note the similarity for the transient and subtransient portions.

A /sqrt(3) term would be a voltage coversion from L-L to L-G voltage and would apply to both transient and subtransient equations.

As I stated before, your prior formulas are incorrect. Look it up.
 

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
Let me save you the trouble of looking because you are not going to find it.

The known electrical engineering world uses I=E/X (for negligent values of R). Not sure where you get your info but you need to refresh your recollection.

I had to wait till I got in because I could not remember the general formula format for sudden faults for a generator but it is:

I = E/Xd + (E/X'd - E/Xd)e^(-t/T'd) + (E/X''d - E/Xd)e^(-t/T''d)

Note the similarity for the transient and subtransient portions.

A /sqrt(3) term would be a voltage coversion from L-L to L-G voltage and would apply to both transient and subtransient equations.

As I stated before, your prior formulas are incorrect. Look it up.

take it up with the author in the link
the 3 term equation is in a link posted in the other fault thread
 

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
there is a simple method using x/r

I" rms = Isym x sqrt[1 + 2e^-(4 Pi cycles / (x/r))]
Isym = v/z
tc = X/( 2 Pi f R) and t = cycles/f

at 0.1 cycle and x/r = 8
I" = Isym x 1.64
 

mivey

Senior Member
The "AIC Calculations & It's Significance" thread? One of your posts?
Well, not there either that I could find. At any rate, there are three possibilities:

1) You are referencing some other link I haven't found where the author has a typo.
2) You are referencing some other link I haven't found where you did not follow the author.
3) You are referencing a link I found where you did not follow the author.

The fact remains (see most any EE text) that the equation is I=E/X for transient and subtransient. That fact means there is nothing to "take up with the author". Until you prove that wrong you will stay wrong and any author who says the same will also be wrong.

Any EE worth their salt will recognize text errata or will look into it if there is a question. Just part of engineering nature to solve mysteries.
 

topgone

Senior Member
Hay… I have 3 generator's feed MSB , etch generator have S=925 KVA, X’d=27.1%, I need to calculate 3 phase short circuit in generator and in MSB for 3 generator's , the length between generator and MSB is 100m , and cable is A=8*(3*95+50)mm2.
Pleas help

From your data, you don't have to worry about the short circuit capacities of your cables. 90mm2 cables have a short-circuit capacity of 13.6kA for 1 second. Since you are using 8 cables per phase (a total capacity of 8 x 298 = 2,384A), you are assured your cables can withstand any short-circuit at your MSB.
 

mivey

Senior Member
Ingenieur,

Are you trying to say something about the DC offset giving a reason to use X'd instead of X''d to find the maximum fault?

You would have to have X'd < X''d which still makes no sense. Consider this:


At the maximum DC offset of sqrt(3) for the subtransient, you would have

I = I'' * (1+sqrt(3)) = 2.732 * I'' = 2.732 * V/X''d

compared to the decayed DC result for the transient of

I = I' * (1+D*sqrt(3)) = (1+D*1.732) * I' = (1+D*1.732) * V/X'd, where D=decay factor (a value between 0 and 100%)



At zero DC offset, you would have

I = I'' * (1+0) = I'' = V/X''d

compared to transient of

I = I' * (1+0) = I' = V/X'd


Which means X'd could at best be equal to X''d for no DC offset or otherwise will have to be smaller than X''d (which makes no sense).

Add: I'm too tired to continue trying to figure you out tonight so I'm calling it quits. :D
 
Last edited:

Julius Right

Senior Member
Occupation
Electrical Engineer Power Station Physical Design Retired
I agree with you, mivey. However, if we take formula 4-58 from IEEE 399 :
I = E/Xd + (E/X'd - E/Xd)e^(-t/T'd) + (E/X''d - E/X'd)e^(-t/T''d)
In this case if t=0 I=E/X"d [VLL/SQRT(3)/X"d] as maximum rms short-circuit current.:weeping:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top