Guys and girls -
Just some comments/opinions concerning "zog's Red Book":
As all know, the IEEE color book series as well as other IEEE standards are peer reviewed papers on design and installation methods.
Why wouldn't one use them as written if possible? If not possible to use as written, why wouldn't adapt the closest?
Suspose you chose to use another method that "had been used before and it worked" instead of a differing method - one from a peer reviewed standard. And it didn't work as per plan this time? What would be your defensible position?
A good engineer is a good thief (of ideas) - and you always give credit. It isn't plagerism if one cites the source.
Do I get out of the box? Sure - different conversation.
carl
Just some comments/opinions concerning "zog's Red Book":
As all know, the IEEE color book series as well as other IEEE standards are peer reviewed papers on design and installation methods.
Why wouldn't one use them as written if possible? If not possible to use as written, why wouldn't adapt the closest?
Suspose you chose to use another method that "had been used before and it worked" instead of a differing method - one from a peer reviewed standard. And it didn't work as per plan this time? What would be your defensible position?
A good engineer is a good thief (of ideas) - and you always give credit. It isn't plagerism if one cites the source.
Do I get out of the box? Sure - different conversation.
carl