ESolar
Senior Member
- Location
- Eureka, CA Humboldt County
- Occupation
- Electrician/Contractor
No issues if as retirede stated you do not require AFCI protection. If so then running two separate two wire circuits is probably better.Why am I not seeing this as standard for MWBCs in this application? Any issues here?
Well, I might be confused.Why am I not seeing this as standard for MWBCs in this application? Any issues here? (Note the dead front is not an outlet even though it states as such)
View attachment 2567746
(As an aside, when labeling panels, please don't use 'GD' for both the disposal and the garage door. Also the inscrutable acronym soup here is hilarious, and I'm just going with it.)
"Excuse me, sir. Seeing as how the V.P. is such a V.I.P., shouldn't we keep the P.C. on the Q.T.? 'Cause if it leaks to the V.C. he could end up M.I.A., and then we'd all be put on K.P." ~ Robin Williams as Adrian Cronauer in Good Morning, VietnamAlso the inscrutable acronym soup here is hilarious, and I'm just going with it.
I use it. Just not shown. Thanks.Using NM,would code require a grounded conductor in the switch outlet. Or would it be exempt for a motor.
Huh?Re ARE, ALOL, AFN.
Thank you.Huh?
I did a house a few years back with both on the same circuit. HO got a 3/4 HP disp, and the DW has a rather high nameplate so it was technically out of code (doubt it would have ever tripped) and the inspector caught it. HO changed disp to a 1/2 HP and wasn't mad, said he'd use the 3/4 elsewhere. Just recently I did 4 townhomes and also did the DW and disp on same circuit, because it was a rather cheap bid job. I knew they would use small cheap DW and disposals and it was fine. Inspector did scold me for "limiting future options for the homeowner". I wanted to smack him so bad, shut the hell up, go get your own 4 unit town home job and you can do it however you want ......
Having the GD and DW on the same circuit probably is fine most of the time ... until someone drops a fork in the GD while the DW is on the heat cycle. Just guessing, not from experience.
I don't mind a friendly recommendation or a "heads up some combinations of DW/disp exceed a single circuit", but he was condescending.At least he acknowledge the difference between code and preference.
They're permitted on the same circuit if the two units do not exceed the circuit ampacity so what was the total current in relation to the branch circuit size?I don't mind a friendly recommendation or a "heads up some combinations of DW/disp exceed a single circuit", but he was condescending.
I forget the specifics, but in the first case they were indeed over a 20 amp circuitThey're permitted on the same circuit if the two units do not exceed the circuit ampacity so what was the total current in relation to the branch circuit size?
ARE - Acronym rich environmentHuh?