svemike
Member
- Location
- Sonoma, CA
Does the 2017 NEC require a GFCI on the 50 amp 240 volt range receptacle?
Does the 2017 NEC require a GFCI on the 50 amp 240 volt range receptacle?
I highly doubt it.
GFCI protection is now required for all single phase receptacles rated 150V to ground or less, 50 A or less and three phase receptacles rated 150V to ground or less, 100 A or less.
GFCI protection is now required for all single phase receptacles rated 150V to ground or less, 50 A or less and three phase receptacles rated 150V to ground or less, 100 A or less.
Are you saying the receptacle used for that range is RATED 150V to ground or less?[/COLOR]
Are you saying the receptacle used for that range is RATED 150V to ground or less?[/COLOR]
Does the 2017 NEC require a GFCI on the 50 amp 240 volt range receptacle?
What is the context of where that quote came from.I am not saying anything, that was a quote from UL.
We can waste time trying to pick it apart or just assume they mean circuits under 150 Volts to ground.
Chapter Two – Wiring and Protection
Revision: 210.8(A) – GFCI Protection – Dwelling Units
GFCI protection has been proposed to be expanded in dwelling units to include not only all 125-volt, but all 250-volt, single-phase, 15- and 20-ampere receptacles installed in the locations specified in 210.8(A), as a shock hazard exists with utilization equipment at these higher voltage levels as well. Portable tools such as air compressors, miter saws, table saws that are rated at 250 volts are widely used in residential areas that see potential shock hazards from ground-fault conditions. With the addition of GFCI protection for these higher voltage receptacles that energize this type of utilization equipment, potentially life-threatening shock hazards could be avoided. It should be noted that only the voltage rating was raised to include GFCI protection. Utilization equipment such as a 250-volt, 30-ampere rated clothes dryer would not be affected by this proposed change.
Comments in your quote are from IAEI, be interesting to see the public input, (proposals) and CMP commentary on this. Sure there is a hazard - but if that is the only approach why don't we have GFCI required on everything and at all utilization voltages? Though there may be a goal to get there eventually. Most GFCI requirements over the years seemed to be added where there is statistical evidence of there being more incidents, not just because there is a risk. Majority of incidents have usually involved 15/20 amp 120 volt receptacles. Everything else was hit and miss where there seemed to be higher statistics of incidents for a specific application.From the IAEI
http://iaeimagazine.org/magazine/2015/04/30/analysis-of-changes-2017-nec/
Can someone post the 2017 NEC text?
My 2017 NEC will be in my hands next week, I wait for one with the MA amendments included.
but if that is the only approach why don't we have GFCI required on everything and at all utilization voltages?
Though it may have been written by someone that has some merits, it is an IAEI document and not an NFPA document. I would expect similar article from say NECA to be worded a little differently as they look at things from slightly different perspective.I don't believe you can make a class A GFCI that will work on all voltages.
Enter the new 'SPGFCI Protection'
Look about halfway down the page http://iaeimagazine.org/magazine/2015/04/30/analysis-of-changes-2017-nec/
:happysad::happysad: