Re: GFCI to break ground loop
dereckbc: I too am curious. While no one "beat me up" over the issue of using a GFCI, I do acknowledge the dangers of a hot short to chassis: (1) shock hazard if there is no path to neutral (which there is via the signal shields); (2) the fire hazard of returning a fault current via the signal shields if the GFCI does not trip. I consider the risks minimal, and acceptable, but do note that a GFCI is no guarantee that someone won't be electrocuted, just a mitigation of the risk.
Still, two things would have to go wrong to have a bad outcome: a fault condition, and either failure of the GFCI to trip or electrocution of a particularly sensitive individual. Given that GFCIs are acceptable per NEC and CEC in situations where safety grounds are not available, I again conclude that the risk is acceptable. I also drive a car and cross streets.
Now, I measured the AC voltage between the signal shield at the sub and the AC receptacle safety ground, and low and behold, saw what appeared to be about 50 mVAC. Of course, full scale on my multimeter was 5 VAC, and the needle movement (yes, it's an old analog meter) was barely half the smallest division, but the needle DID budge. I made sure to not touch the probe tips lest the stray field on my body was being picked up. The little mirror on the face of the meter to ensure one is reading it squarely was handy
.
I did note some oxidation of the copper at the point where the service entrance is grounded to the cold water pipe entrance so perhaps this needs to be rebonded (though I measured no appreciable resistance at this point between the ground wire and pipe).
I did notice that if I grounded my meter where the service is grounded to the cold water entry pipe, and touched the other meter lead, I'd pick up several hunderd mV AC. This didn't surprise me: there are AC lines all over the place through the first story floor joists (I was in the basement). But, it makes me wonder if I'm seeing 60 Hz AC induced on the loop I've got from ground to sat entry to sat rx to tv to receiver to sub amp to safety ground to service panel to ground, currently broken by way of the ungrounded GFCI.
Then again, the house neutral and safety ground are essentially in parallel between the service entry and power transformer on the pole (assuming a really good earth ground). It is unlikely that both phases of the 240 VAC entry carry the same current, so there will be some current in the neutral (and safety ground) return from the service entrance to the utility transformer. I'm told a few amps on the safety ground is not unusual.
So, we have 20 feet of #6 safety ground from the service entrance to the cold water pipe entrance, and effectively accross this, the safety ground to the sub AC recepticle, signal lead shield, and a 10 foot run of #10 from the satellite entry. IIRC, 20 feet of #6 has 7.94 milliOhms resistance, and to sustain a voltage across it of 50 mV requires a current of 6.30 Amps. Doesn't strike me that it's out of the realm of possibility. Again, assuming the same resistance in the earth ground and neutral path from the service entrance to utility transformer, that's a total imbalance of 12.6 Amps on a 200A service. Gee, someone plugged in an electric kettle on a 110 VAC line, or turned on the microwave. Sounds plausable to me,
Bonding the satellite antenna entry at the service entrance instead of the cold water pipe entry would eliminate this problem, but would be less safe and not code complient.
If my analysis is correct I will either have to stick with the GFCI solution, or use an isolation transformer on the sub power supply (good to 250W), or audio isolation transformers on the signal lines.