Gounding And Bonding Emt Question

Status
Not open for further replies.
iwire said:
IMO the EGC is clearly not a circuit conductor.
Click to expand...

I agree too. It seems kind of silly that you can actually be splicing the EGC and are not required to connect it to the box.
 
I got the verbiage from the Internet which has Article 250.118 from the 2005 NEC. I assumed this was a copy of the 2005 NEC page.

The page looks identical to one from the 2005 NEC.

The Header is in the same font and identical to our 2005 NEC. It reads "ARTICLE 250-GROUNDING AND BONDING."

The footer reads " 70-110R, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, 2005 Edition".

There are bars in the margins indicating a change.

We have a 2005 NEC and a 2008 NEC and neither one mentions EMT with an additional equipment grounding conductor. Sorry for the confusion. I woner where this page came from?
 
Phil Devine said:
I got the verbiage from the Internet which has Article 250.118 from the 2005 NEC. I assumed this was a copy of the 2005 NEC page.
Click to expand...

My copy of the 2005 has a bullet in next to the bottom of the text we are referring to. Perhaps it was in the 2002 and was deleted and some one posted to the internet incorrectly. :-?

I think the answer to the dillema lies in "Charlie's Law"
 
I wish we could find a definitive answer. I will see if I can find the link that gave me the NFPA 70R page. That sent me off on this tangent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top