gar
Senior Member
- Location
- Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Occupation
- EE
110628-1241 EDT
I have power back on. It was off for about 2+ hours while they replaced both cross members, fuses, insulators, etc. Originally they were going to also replace the transformer, but did not. That may happen later. Very interesting crew, worked well together.
On Time Error Correction Reliability Standard p 14 under section C may be the reason for Time Error Correction being costly.
So many of the statements are of a qualitative rather than quantitative nature that it is very hard to get a reasoned analysis of why there is a problem other than rules that have been made or may be made. They seem to ignore the effect of devices that are line frequency driven that control something that relates to time of day.
Today after my power was restored I had three LED digital clocks, one oven, and one microwave that had to be reset.
In a derivative report I found some reference that a time drift of 2 or 5 seconds was a criteria to initiate a Time Error Correction.
If Time Error Correction is dropped, then I suspect that a number of unintended consequences will result. Similar problems have occurred with other rules --- Like toilets that don't function correctly because of government rules. Dishwashers and clothes washers that don't get things clean.
It is probably possible to build new devices that may not cost to much to get accurate timing information to low cost devices. For example a central receiver that receives NIST data for a building or portion of a building, then retransmits this data in the building to low cost receivers. Greatest problem may be in large factories, or metal buildings. A lot of industrial timers are in NEMA-4 enclosures.
.
I have power back on. It was off for about 2+ hours while they replaced both cross members, fuses, insulators, etc. Originally they were going to also replace the transformer, but did not. That may happen later. Very interesting crew, worked well together.
On Time Error Correction Reliability Standard p 14 under section C may be the reason for Time Error Correction being costly.
So many of the statements are of a qualitative rather than quantitative nature that it is very hard to get a reasoned analysis of why there is a problem other than rules that have been made or may be made. They seem to ignore the effect of devices that are line frequency driven that control something that relates to time of day.
Today after my power was restored I had three LED digital clocks, one oven, and one microwave that had to be reset.
In a derivative report I found some reference that a time drift of 2 or 5 seconds was a criteria to initiate a Time Error Correction.
If Time Error Correction is dropped, then I suspect that a number of unintended consequences will result. Similar problems have occurred with other rules --- Like toilets that don't function correctly because of government rules. Dishwashers and clothes washers that don't get things clean.
It is probably possible to build new devices that may not cost to much to get accurate timing information to low cost devices. For example a central receiver that receives NIST data for a building or portion of a building, then retransmits this data in the building to low cost receivers. Greatest problem may be in large factories, or metal buildings. A lot of industrial timers are in NEMA-4 enclosures.
.