wireday
Senior Member
- Location
- New England
- Occupation
- Master electrician
Do they make a split bolt thats listed for #10-#2 solid
Generally speaking, documents never care... but on this and several other related matters, I care. Most inspectors care to some degree. To what degree you care is up to you.if the code doesn't care, why should I?
Yes.Do they make a split bolt thats listed for #10-#2 solid
Generally speaking, documents never care... but on this and several other related matters, I care. Most inspectors care to some degree. To what degree you care is up to you.
That said, the way I see it when in a section regarding the grounding electrode system, any mentioned jumper is a grounding electrode jumper. Not an equipment bonding jumper or any other type of bonding jumper. I believe it makes a difference.
Code isn't that specific. Tradespeople must use their professional judgment coupled with the requirements of 250.4.Question on bonding to structural steel, Is it ok to use the thinner wall girder, the ones that the siding gets screwed to ?Also are the bolts that attach them to the major trusses Ok or should we bond at that steel junction as well.
Because many (or at least a fewthe point would be that it does not appear that the same rules apply to bonding jumpers between GE as apply to an actual GEC, so why would I care what rules apply to a GEC when looking at a GE bonding jumper?
Because many (or at least a few) are one and the same.
Not saying they will ever be the same. Pretty obvious they will never be the same... so quit jerking my chain. :rant:when would a GE bonding jumper ever be a GEC?
The inspectors in Carrboro NC made me change a 1/2" UL Listed 8ft grd, rod. To a 5/8ths , They made me look bad to my customers.
That #10 was from memory. Apparently, my memory isn't what it used to be. It appears the requirement is not smaller than 14AWG, not greater than 6AWG. I believe all Chapter 8 articles state the current-carrying capacity must be at least that of the communication cable's grounded member(s) and protected conductor(s). No greater specificity is offered.Is it in the NEC about the min size ground/bonding wires for the different Com company's, Smart$ mention #10 for broadband coax.
You may be right that it doesn't actually say that. But it sort of makes it appear as though that is what they intend.The code doesn't actually say that. It just requires the connection be made there.
Code isn't that specific. Tradespeople must use their professional judgment coupled with the requirements of 250.4.
I have never looked it up, but if I recall correctly, structural steel would be exactly that. Red iron. Purlins are not structural, per se, mostly just to attach siding, the siding itself provides the shear support.
Take the purlins out from under roof steel and throw three feet of snow on the roof and then try to tell me those purlins don't provide any structural support![]()
I agree with you for what is typically called a purlin. However, the question I replied to used the term "thinner wall girder". I do not know his "thinner wall girder" was, in fact, a purlin. My reply reflected facts not in evidence.I have never looked it up, but if I recall correctly, structural steel would be exactly that. Red iron. Purlins are not structural, per se, mostly just to attach siding, the siding itself provides the shear support.
:happyyes:Man this is a lot of hand wringing about a superfluous ground rod.