grounding a bucket truck or crane

Status
Not open for further replies.

eric stromberg

Senior Member
Location
Texas
Should the chassis of bucket trucks be connected to ground?

I've seen bucket trucks with a cable connected between the frame of the truck and the grounding conductor that runs up the pole. Does it makes sense to do this? Seems to me it would be safer not to do this. But there are so may different types of hazards out there, protecting against one might make things more dangerous for others.

Thoughts?

Eric
 
I believe that NESC work rules require the truck to be grounded, or employees kept away. I wouldn't be surprised to find that OSHA requires it as well.

I think it is a very good idea. It keeps the likelihood of touching an inadvertently energized truck to a minimum, and also will protect equipment. I have seen more than one instance where a vehicle caught fire and burned up completely after a primary line fell on it. Usually the tires will track enough current to heat up and catch fire.

Jim T
 
This is addressed in OSHA 1910.333. When I worked for Public Service Co. of New Mexico many moons ago, we always grounded our bucket trucks and line trucks when working on energized lines.
 
"...I have seen more than one instance where a vehicle caught fire and burned up completely after a primary line fell on it. Usually the tires will track enough current to heat up and catch fire...."

I have heard this many times. I don't doubt the fires, but the mechanism is suspect. We do medium voltage testing (12.47/7.2 kV) and have had opportunity to test truck tires and small car tires. In each case we tied the 7.2 kV line to the metallic rims (either directly or indirectly through the car body). The conventional wisdom was that leakage current (particularly through steel-belted radials) would cause resistive heating, which would eventually melt the tires or set then on fire (or cause the air in the tire to expand to the point that it overpressured the tire and blew it out).

When we energized the line, with the tires on the ground, nothing happened. We let this situation persist for a long time. Afterwards, there was not even any apparent heat-up of the tires where they touched the ground.

If we had so much as a blade of grass that was tall enough to touch the undercarriage, however, it was a different story. The vegetation was conductive enough to conduct but the vegetation quickly burned up. The resulting smoke in the air reduced the impedance of the air path so that an arc was created directly between the metallic undercarriage and the ground. The process fed on itself, with the arcing causing more fire and the fire causing more smoke-inducing arcing. The tires eventually caught fire from the grass fire and/or from the intense heat of the arcing, and as a result, the tires finally melted/blew-out.

The end result is much the same (blown tires, truck sitting on rims, electrical and fire hazard) but the mechanism was interesting to observe.

Carl
 
Re: grounding a bucket truck or crane

eric stromberg said:
Should the chassis of bucket trucks be connected to ground?
This is the same as the discussion about whether electric supplies should be grounded. In my opinion, the benefits outweigh the risks. What if someone steps between an energized truck and the ground?
 
Eric, many times a line truck has an insulated upper boom section.

The grounding of the truck frame and lower boom will protect the workers on the ground while not 'grounding' the person up in the bucket.
 
All bucket and line trucks I have ever seen have fiber glass booms, Fiber buckets, and insulated liners. The boom, liners, and buckets are tested quarterly to ensure they remain isolated from the truck frame. Last thing a lineman wants is to be grounded.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top