I guess I'm going to have to start bringing my 2005NEC home with me. One of these days I'm going to quote something out of my '02 and it will have changed. I don't think that's so in this case.
Art. 600.7(A) states that listed fmc that encloses the secondary circuit conductor from a neon transformer shall be permitted as a bonding means if the total accumulative length of the conduit in the secondary circuit does not exceed 100ft. What I call the 100' rule. Before this was code, the 6' rule as stated in Art. 250.118(6) applied.
BTW, I must have read Art. 600 fifty times between 2002 and 2005 before the 100' rule struck me, and I must've done dozens of jobs using the 6' rule. I sure wish you would've said something, Gaylord.
What is it that makes fmc a better bond in 600.7(A) than in 250.118(6)?
Another BTW. Due to the limitations on the length of neon even the largest transformers can control, I can't think of any circumstance where there would be 100' of secondary conductor for neon in a single ground path, and still comply with the NEC and transformer manufacturers' guidelines. 60' at the most and that would be extreme.
Art. 600.7(A) states that listed fmc that encloses the secondary circuit conductor from a neon transformer shall be permitted as a bonding means if the total accumulative length of the conduit in the secondary circuit does not exceed 100ft. What I call the 100' rule. Before this was code, the 6' rule as stated in Art. 250.118(6) applied.
BTW, I must have read Art. 600 fifty times between 2002 and 2005 before the 100' rule struck me, and I must've done dozens of jobs using the 6' rule. I sure wish you would've said something, Gaylord.
What is it that makes fmc a better bond in 600.7(A) than in 250.118(6)?
Another BTW. Due to the limitations on the length of neon even the largest transformers can control, I can't think of any circumstance where there would be 100' of secondary conductor for neon in a single ground path, and still comply with the NEC and transformer manufacturers' guidelines. 60' at the most and that would be extreme.