Hi everyone I haven't posted here for a while but am always watching all on the forum. I hope all of you are well,and getting along with NEC 2008.
I am hoping for an opinion from some or all of you.
Yesterday I did an inspection of a office trailer for a business, that will be permanent ( not that it makes any deference ). I failed the inspection because there is no grounding electrode at the trailer panel.
The trailer panel has a feeder from a service located about 10 ft. from it with a Main Breaker at that location. The electrician feels that there is no requirement for a grounding electrode at the trailer panel because there is one at the service.
My opinion is that Art. 100 definition is that it is a structure,
Sec. 250.32 (A) requires that it will have a grounding electrode system, in accordance with part III of articale 250.
Sec.250.56 in part III applies to the 25 ohm or less rule, should ground rods serve as the electrodes. So I am telling him that he may need to provide 2 ground rods. I always felt that was the case even before NEC 2008.
Thanks to all Romeo
I am hoping for an opinion from some or all of you.
Yesterday I did an inspection of a office trailer for a business, that will be permanent ( not that it makes any deference ). I failed the inspection because there is no grounding electrode at the trailer panel.
The trailer panel has a feeder from a service located about 10 ft. from it with a Main Breaker at that location. The electrician feels that there is no requirement for a grounding electrode at the trailer panel because there is one at the service.
My opinion is that Art. 100 definition is that it is a structure,
Sec. 250.32 (A) requires that it will have a grounding electrode system, in accordance with part III of articale 250.
Sec.250.56 in part III applies to the 25 ohm or less rule, should ground rods serve as the electrodes. So I am telling him that he may need to provide 2 ground rods. I always felt that was the case even before NEC 2008.
Thanks to all Romeo