... I'd be curious what the design would look like if heating were the primary goal. Would the compressor for a heating only unit be inside the house? What about putting the heat pump evaporator coil in an attic space to take advantage of solar heat gain? Would lower boiling refrigerant be used? ...
The compressor might or might not be indoors. The main path of heat transfer (in the hermetic compressors most-commonly used for residential HVAC) is the refrigerant flowing through the compressor case, not ambient air flowing over it. People concerned with noise will be reluctant to locate it indoors.
There'd be little point in putting the evaporator in the attic; there's negligible solar heat gain in wintertime, especially with snow on the roof.
"Lower boiling point" sorta misses the point of refrigeration. The boiling and condensing temperatures are dependent on pressure, which is how a refrigeration cycle works in the first place: compress the refrigerant to a high pressure so that it condenses and dissipates heat at a (relatively) high temperature, the reduce the pressure so that it evaporates and absorbs heat at a low temperature.
There are some refrigerants commonly known as "low-temperature" refrigerants, that offer higher pressures, and more-importantly, higher gas densities, but refrigerant selection is a compromise of a myriad of different characteristics, and the difference between "high" summer temperatures and "low" winter temperatures isn't enough to drive the selection by itself.
Ammonia is commonly used for large low-temperature refrigeration. Frozen-food processing plants, for example, where the evaporator temperature is -40º. It offers the best efficiency, which in large systems is important enough to offset its drawbacks. (toxic, noxious, flammable, explosive and aggressively corrosive to copper and its alloys) But you'd never tolerate that for residential work.
(and by "large", I'm referring to systems that are significantly bigger than hockey rinks, few of which use ammonia)