Frank you got me there as I fell into my own trap.By Frank: In that exception that Volt101 pointed out it did say one set to each building.
What I can't see is that it's ok to do this very samething if the 320 meter is mounted on the house, but if it is mounted remote it's not?The problem is some can't see that little two letter word and think every place there is a meter there should be a disconnect.
Now George quit hanging around with BIL and go back and look at 230.1 Figure 230.1 and tell me where it says that service entrance conductors have to enter the building?By George: If they never enter a building, there are no service entrance conductors.
What does that picture have to do with anything?Originally posted by hurk27:
Now George quit hanging around with BIL and go back and look at 230.1 Figure 230.1 and tell me where it says that service entrance conductors have to enter the building?
Article 100 (2002) Service-Entrance Conductors, Underground System. The service conductors between the terminals of the service equipment and the point of connection to the service lateral.
FPN: Where service equipment is located outside the building walls, there may be no service-entrance conductors, or they may be entirely outside the building.
FPN: Where service equipment is located outside the building walls, there may be no service-entrance conductors, or they may be entirely outside the building.
I would suspect that this would be a case where the meter is at the road and the service laterals land in the service disconnect at the house thus no SEC's.there may be no service-entrance conductors,
As this Say's they can be entirely outside as where the laterals/drop lands at another building then land in a disconnect on the outside of the house the house.or they may be entirely outside the building.