What is Article 550.4 referring to then if it's not what the narrative actually says in title and the following narrative 550.4(A)
Mobile Home Not Intended as a Dwelling Unit. ?
Electrically this section [550.4(A)], after some preliminary definition and caveats continues with: "It shall, however, meet all other applicable requirements of this article if provided with an electrical installation intended to be energized from a 120-volt or 120/240-volt ac power supply system." (NEC 2017)
I've seen many structures that from the outside other than being very "plane jane" is indistinguishable from a dwelling unit type of mobile home. I have seen these "plane Jane's" used as contractor offices, banks, school classrooms and even a diner.
Article 545 from my perspective is clearly indicated in structures that are part of or modules within a larger structure that is factory or manufactured as a component of the overall building. I've seen these, they are complete modules that are moved to a site then connected with other matching or linking modules, electrical and other mechanicals are fully installed in each module then interconnected on site.
Other forms may be less clear in application covered by 545, but may still be a 545 structure. IDK
If the classroom being described here is module as I suggest above, it would appear to be a 545 structure. But if it is fully free standing, whether a single section or part of a "double wide" I see it more related to 550 as 550.4 would make it applicable. No matter if wheels remain or not.
The difference also may be seen if the manufactured structure has only branch circuits brought into it and no panel it would likely be a 545, if it has feeder or service conductors with it's own panel then likely a 550 structure.
None of these statements are absolutes but more generalities. If as
@don_resqcapt19 indicates the 2020 makes a better clearification, I would be interested in the wording that makes it clearer as I don't have 2020 (were under the 2017 here).
As a side question, if a newer code adds clarity to an ambiguous code of an older cycle that a jurisdiction might be under, can we use the newer code to justify or clarify the ambiguity of understanding?
I realize not useful where there is an actual change in the code such as adding AFCI requirements like happened between 2008 to 2014, or the exterior emergency disconnect of 2020.