How did he break the law? You can WRITE almost anything. He has not done anything. You can legally pay cash.
It is now obvious I did not see the OP since it has been edited.... I dont know
please explain that for me.
We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of this forum or any entity associated with this forum.
........Yes, I'm too lazy to pull out a dollar bill and look...........
Dolfan said:please explain that for me.
Am I missing something please point out what is so bad or wrong about the first post!!!!
I don't know what to explain. All I know is nothing is wrong about the first post as it stands. It has been edited but I have not had the privilege to see what it said befor it was edited.
Mike, the original post was edited by Rob for improper content. Asking us to re-post the text that Rob deemed to be in the OP's best interest not to share with the world kind of defeats the purpose of the action.Am I missing something please point out what is so bad or wrong about the first post!!!!
I need a helper part time when the work come in. My question is what is the best way to pay this person...
Mike, the original post was edited by Rob for improper content. Asking us to re-post the text that Rob deemed to be in the OP's best interest not to share with the world kind of defeats the purpose of the action.
Tonight, I was asked by one member to delete an old thread that the poster was concerned about coming back on him in the real world. In this case, I believe Rob was being proactive in that same vein, and I support his action.
So, let's get back to what we can discuss without any reservation:
Mike, the original post was edited by Rob for improper content. Asking us to re-post the text that Rob deemed to be in the OP's best interest not to share with the world kind of defeats the purpose of the action.
Tonight, I was asked by one member to delete an old thread that the poster was concerned about coming back on him in the real world. In this case, I believe Rob was being proactive in that same vein, and I support his action.
So, let's get back to what we can discuss without any reservation: