teufelhounden91
Senior Member
- Location
- Austin, TX, USA
hospital grade mc
Did some digging in the NEC.
Need to go back and specify both areas Im talking about are dentist patient care areas. Not patient bed locations or critical care areas.
517.13(A) says branch circuits shall be provided with an effective ground fault current path...a cable having a metallic armor or sheath. the metal cable armor or sheath shall itself qualify as an EGC in concordance with 250.118. Doesn't say it has to be HGMC or say it has to have a second redundant equipment ground for the entire branch ckt. Just says it must have AN effective ground fault path for the branch ckt.
250.118(10) says MC is an effective ground fault path of it contains and insulated or uninsulated egc. (Doesn't say both are required) Most normal mc qualifies here in my opinion. If it has an insulated or uninsulated EGC inside the sheath/armor may be used as an EGC. (For redundancy I suppose)
250.122(A) says if cable armor or sheath IS USED as the EGC (as achieved by 250.118 it is considered an effective ground fault other per 250.4(A)(5) or (B)(4)
Lastly 330.108 lists MC sheath as an approved EGC as long as it passes 250.118(10)
The takeaway...in patient care areas regular mc can be used. It doesn't say HGMC is required in such areas in 517.13. Also all of these articles point to MC sheath/armor being acceptable as an EGC so it seems you can change over to regular mc in a hallway as long as you keep the branch ckt having AN effective ground fault path...not two.
Even 517.19 mentions while you must use HG plugs, MC sheath/armor is allowed to be used as an EGC.
So why did we say EMT was ok in the halls but MC was not?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did some digging in the NEC.
Need to go back and specify both areas Im talking about are dentist patient care areas. Not patient bed locations or critical care areas.
517.13(A) says branch circuits shall be provided with an effective ground fault current path...a cable having a metallic armor or sheath. the metal cable armor or sheath shall itself qualify as an EGC in concordance with 250.118. Doesn't say it has to be HGMC or say it has to have a second redundant equipment ground for the entire branch ckt. Just says it must have AN effective ground fault path for the branch ckt.
250.118(10) says MC is an effective ground fault path of it contains and insulated or uninsulated egc. (Doesn't say both are required) Most normal mc qualifies here in my opinion. If it has an insulated or uninsulated EGC inside the sheath/armor may be used as an EGC. (For redundancy I suppose)
250.122(A) says if cable armor or sheath IS USED as the EGC (as achieved by 250.118 it is considered an effective ground fault other per 250.4(A)(5) or (B)(4)
Lastly 330.108 lists MC sheath as an approved EGC as long as it passes 250.118(10)
The takeaway...in patient care areas regular mc can be used. It doesn't say HGMC is required in such areas in 517.13. Also all of these articles point to MC sheath/armor being acceptable as an EGC so it seems you can change over to regular mc in a hallway as long as you keep the branch ckt having AN effective ground fault path...not two.
Even 517.19 mentions while you must use HG plugs, MC sheath/armor is allowed to be used as an EGC.
So why did we say EMT was ok in the halls but MC was not?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk