- Location
- New Jersey
- Occupation
- Journeyman Electrician
How does that make one any different than the other? It's either code compliant or it isn't.But those cases are unavoidable. With a service panel you have a choice.
How does that make one any different than the other? It's either code compliant or it isn't.But those cases are unavoidable. With a service panel you have a choice.
For any number of reasons that don't apply to a disconnect or FS box, a service panel is different. The Code can easily say no outside service panels which eliminates the entry issue as an added bonus.How does that make one any different than the other?
There is no difference except for the entry into the panel below the live parts. All FS boxes would require a wet location rated entry into the box, a panel cabinet would require the same wet location entry rating if above live parts.For any number of reasons that don't apply to a disconnect or FS box, a service panel is different. The Code can easily say no outside service panels which eliminates the entry issue as an added bonus.
-Hal
Is that explicitly written in the code somewhere? Or are we to infer that from the descriptions in 110.28?If it is NEMA 3R, as I stated, it is a wet location.
I am going on the NEMA designation requirementsIs that explicitly written in the code somewhere? Or are we to infer that from the descriptions in 110.28?
I guess I was assuming it would be written as clearly as 300.9 if enclosures have a similar requirement.
Rob G
Seattle
Kind of is kind of is not.If it is NEMA 3R, as I stated, it is a wet location.
Then you would need to create "indoors" for applications that have a service but don't have "indoors". I run into a lot of this on farms.It's time for the Code to prohibit outside service panels. Then there will be no excuse.