bphgravity
Senior Member
- Location
- Florida
Maybe its a product standard issue that the NEC is simply restating. Perhaps it's because smaller loads have smaller parts and components that may not be capable or suitable of the stress of higher voltages?
Twoskinsoneman said:I would think the reason would be to discourage the use of 240v circuits, which have the potential to do more damage to the human body. Unless you have a good reason (such as a high-power piece of equipment) stick to 120v.
Twoskinsoneman said:I guess I was thinking there was the potential to get shocked by a higher voltage which would cause more current in the body. But after considering it I realized the danger it still using your body to make a circuit path to ground. This would still only be 120v. I guess the danger of getting 240v through you at a 240v outlet is unrealistic.
stickboy1375 said:I love it when someone tells me they have been shocked by 240 volts...![]()
iwire said:![]()
You almost have to try to get a true 240 volt shock.
I doubt many appliance users have ever received a 240 volt shock.
docluv said:while studing to brighten my future.I came across a question in a study guide that I can't understand,how the code rule makes it safer for the un-electricaly inclined.The question reads,"Is a 1200 watt,240-volt heater,on a cord plug-in legal in a dwelling unit." the anwser is no. "The load must be greater that 1440watts for voltages higher than 120. "210.6(a)(2). I repeat WHAT?
stickboy1375 said:I love it when someone tells me they have been shocked by 240 volts...![]()
