peter d said:Big deal. :roll: I can put 10 billion on a single circuit.![]()
You may suffer a voltage drop issue, and carpel tunnel.
peter d said:Big deal. :roll: I can put 10 billion on a single circuit.![]()
iwire said:No offense meant but your previous post was unclear, at least to me.
acrwc10 said:You may suffer a voltage drop issue, and carpel tunnel.Please post a picture when you finish we'd all love to see it.
masterinbama said:Their local view on this is 8 on a 15amp and 10 on a 20 amp.
masterinbama said:Just talked with the City of Decatur AL. inspector on this issue . Their local view on this is 8 on a 15amp and 10 on a 20 amp.
masterinbama said:Just talked with the City of Decatur AL. inspector on this issue . Their local view on this is 8 on a 15amp and 10 on a 20 amp.
masterinbama said:Just talked with the City of Decatur AL. inspector on this issue . Their local view on this is 8 on a 15amp and 10 on a 20 amp.
I don?t want to reopen the old debate. But I will point out that this sentence is the beginning of one side?s point of view from the same debate. Please look for the previous discussions, before attempting to put in a comment here. I will only say that the opposing point of view is that 220 and 210 do not mix. The viewpoint is that you cannot use any 180 VA statements in the calculation portions of 220 as the basis for design of a branch circuit that is described in 210.wbalsam1 said:All outlets that are not covered in 220.14 (A) through (K) shall be calculated based on 180 volt-amperes per outlet.
Here is an excellent example of why you should not take the Handbook as being the repository of all truth. Some participants in the debate to which I refer above would disagree with the handbook?s statement that there are any limits whatsoever on the number of receptacles on a branch circuit, regardless of whether on a dwelling unit or a commercial building.roger said:Valleybuilt, the following is commentary from the National Electrical Code Handbook, notice the different requirements for residential.
charlie b said:
?I will only say that the opposing point of view is that 220 and 210 do not mix?
you mean it would be 0 volts at the end of the circuit not the full 120.mikeames said:Physically you cold not because it would be so long of a circuit that the VD at the end would be the full 120.
tryinghard said:Charlie, I can appreciate the fact that Article 220 is for calculating purposes but feeders, services and distribution equipment are sized from it inferring its use as application.
210.11 seems to mix [tie] directly to Article 220.
steelersman said:you mean it would be 0 volts at the end of the circuit not the full 120.
steelersman said:you mean it would be 0 volts at the end of the circuit not the full 120.
yeah i guessiwire said:He had it right, the voltage drop would be the full 120 volts.
acrwc10 said:You may suffer a voltage drop issue, and carpel tunnel.Please post a picture when you finish we'd all love to see it.
masterinbama said:Actually I tried to spin him on this one,but you know where you get with arguing with inspectors. I pointed out that these are actually duplex receptacles, therefore at 180 volt amps per outlet you could only get 5 duplex receptacles on a 20 amp branch circuit.