... I would like to take 25 amps from A and B and put the 50 amp load on C. Can I hook up a transformer to the 208 leg and transform it to 120 volts? All single phase 120/240 breakers cannot be moved due to
all 120 volt loads.
all 240v loads are connected to C
Customer will not pay me to change wire location...no benefit to him
Using a transformer connected as proposed is... well, unheard of. But, I don't know of any prohibiting requirement. You will likely have to use a two-pole breaker, as it has been mentioned here before that no one manufacturers a full-rated single-pole.
Another issue... You are wanting to remove load from A-N and B-N and put it on C-N to balance the load to reduce or eliminate dimming of lighting. The question is whether the dimming is due to voltage drop (conductor loading) or voltage sag (transformer loading), or both. The proposed 208-120 arrangement will help with voltage drop (the current would no longer be on Lines A and B), but does very little to shift the transformer loading...
Consider first that current of the A-B connected load (which includes A-N and B-N connected loads) doesn't just flow on the A-B service winding. Assuming equal sized, full-delta pots, only 2/3 of it does. The other 1/3 flows on the A-C and C-B pots. Pot A-B has an impedance of 1z, while pots A-C and C-B have a combined series impedance of 2z. Your proposed 25A of A-N plus 25A of B-N load shift is 25A of A-B load shift. 16.7A flows on pot A-B, the other 8.3A through pots A-C and B-C.
The same loads shifted to your transformer present a 50A?120V?208V=28.8A load. Again assuming a full-delta service, 14.4A of that will flow on each pots A-C and B-C and each half of pot A-B. You effectively added an additional 73% (the 0.73 of 1.73) of the connected load to the service load (14.4A?240V?3=10.4kVA vs 25A?240=6kVA). If you consider winding current, you dropped 16.7A from pot A-B and added 14.4A back to it, while you dropped 8.3A each from pots A-C and B-C and added 14.4A back to them.
Can you see where you gain very little?
I would consider kwired's suggestion (if POCO remains stubborn) to go with a separately derived system transformer, such as 240D?208Y/120V.