According to NEC 440, HVAC equipment wire and OCPD can be sized according to the manufacturer's nameplate ratings. This often results in a wire size per the minimum circuit ampacity that does not correspond to the maximum protective device allowed by the nameplate. (For example, often a 5 ton split-system condenser can be served per the nameplate with a max of50A breaker and a min of #8 wire) I have used this calculation since first allowed by the NEC and have experienced no problems, complaints, or "call backs". Recently, engineers on several jobs have required that the exception allowed in 440 not be used and that the wire be sized according to ampacity tables in 310. Obviously, I am going to do that the engineer specs! But they could give me no justification for disallowing the use of the art. 440 exception other than 'he was not comfortable with that method.' (voltage drop was not a factor ... the equipment was within 20' of the service panels) Is there any evidence or expereince to indicate that using the code allowed sizing is the source of real problems? I know the code is not a design standard, rather a safety minimum. But whatever wire size you select, someone could always say the next size up would be safer!