kingpb
Senior Member
- Location
- SE USA as far as you can go
- Occupation
- Engineer, Registered
jim dungar said:True, but you make it sound like it is impossible for an IEC device to have to have two different sets of short circuit ratings.
Square D circuit breakers carry both UL Listed and IEC ratings on their nameplates as do Telemecanique contactors. This way a single device can be applied worldwide.
Straight out of the SqD Catalog for a breaker:
View attachment 396
You'll take note that there are different columns for UL/CSA and IEC, with different values.
The point I am trying to illustrate here is that when it says 65kA under the UL column, that means it is good for 65kA calculated by IEEE methods. The rating under the IEC column, which in fact also says 65kA for some models applied at 415Vac/240Vac, is based on current calculated by IEC 60909. The 65kA IEC is not equal to 65kA IEEE because of how the calculation methods differ. So, you cannot plug an IEC breaker into a panel, where the fault current is calculated to be 65kA (IEEE method) and expect it to always perform properly. Whats interesting is that SqD explains interrupting and withstand ratings, but the fact of the matter is that IEC uses short circuit breaking current, and peak current/making current (which is usually only a 1- sec rating, bus has a 3-sec rating). So, if the IEC peak/make rating is 65kA, the breaking current rating is only going to be around 26kA (2.5x). Whereas the UL/CSA equipment can withstand 65kA making or breaking.
I also looked at the SqD free software for IEC and NEMA contactor sizing (2 different sizing spreadsheets). Intersestingly enough they do not mention short circuit ratings at all. Which smells of mackerel to me.
Rule of Thumb: If it's a US or Canada standard project, then use NEMA, ANSI, IEEE, UL, CSA, etc. If it's international, use IEC. Do not mix apples and oranges.