IECC C405.11

Location
Colorado
Occupation
Electrical Design
It seems as though our industry is still grappling with the new regulations concerning Automatic Receptacle Control in Offices and Conference rooms. The IECC Code states in part "... At least 50 percent of all 125V, 15- and 20-amp receptacles installed in enclosed offices, conference rooms, rooms used primarily for copy or print functions, breakrooms, classrooms and individual workstations, including those installed in modular partitions and module office workstation systems. ..." - IECC 2021 C405.11

My Question is: Is there options out there for controlling multiple circuits in the same room or work space with one control device? e.g. There is four workstations in one bull pin area in the front lobby of a small clinic, three or more circuits will be needed to supply power to all the workstations in the area. Under the IECC code listed we will need to control at least 50% of all receptacles in this area no matter what circuit they are associated with. My thought is that the simple solution is to install a 4th circuit with only controlled devices and install 50% of the devices in the area on the one circuit. The reality is that nothing important or permanent will be plugged into the controlled devices because they will turn off each time there is not someone in the area for more than 20 minutes. But is this the intent of this code? Probably not? What is the actual thought process behind this code requirement?
 

MyCleveland

Senior Member
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
You sir are a genius.
VW is looking for new designers for EPA diesel emission compliance team.

Seriously though, while likely compliant, is it not a great waste of expensive resources?
Talk over with your client and get feedback before going forward.

My state exempted this from being required, or at least last time I checked. Have you checked to see if your state has done something similar?

Relay panels that control the area lighting can also be used for controlling the receptacle circuits.
Check in with the sales reps for these products and they will walk you through all of the sensor control types and wall controls/override options.
 
Location
Colorado
Occupation
Electrical Design
I’m not sure if the first comment was calculated to be insulting or what its purpose was but it was definitely unnecessary. Secondly yes, our state definitely requires it and that is my point in going to a public forum to seek “professional” advice on options and alternative ways to comply with codes (though the code may be completely insane and a complete waist of money time and effort. In my opinion it’s still a code that has been adopted)
My point in asking the question is to find simple solutions to issues created by code making panels that are ether not thought through or totally calculated to create markets for products that those on the code panels benefit from.
Whatever the case your response gave no substantive answers or suggestions to actually solving any of the questions asked. Thank you for your response!
 

JohnE

Senior Member
Location
Milford, MA
I didn't read that comment to be insulting. I took it to mean that you found a "work around" to the code that is compliant, but it doesn't achieve the intent of the code. I think MyCleveland answered your original question and he did suggest checking in with reps and also to check with your customer to find the "best" solution.
 

MyCleveland

Senior Member
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Ephraim.Barlow

I apologize if you took this as an insult or a slight against your character. I can only state is was not my intent.

"You sir are a genius." You came up with a way to comply with the code...no matter how someone interrupts your intent.

"VW is looking for new designers for EPA diesel emission compliance team."
I was trying to say you could help the VW team learn something about compliance WITHIN the rules.

"My state exempted this from being required, or at least last time I checked. Have you checked to see if your state has done something similar?"
I was not implying laziness or ignorance....many posters simply are not aware of this and it was just a reminder for you to look into the issue.

"is it not a great waste of expensive resources?"
This one you have to answer for yourself.

"Talk over with your client and get feedback before going forward."
I meant exactly that...DO NOTHING without your customers full knowledge.
I have had customers that would be onboard with the idea, until they realized the added cost. Others were "GREEN" to the bone and are content with following the rules as these committees have laid out.

The balance was just simple advice on who is best at assisting you in laying out a compliant control package.
 
Top