AC\DC
Senior Member
- Location
- Florence,Oregon,Lane
- Occupation
- EC
Ya but how long is the question
A 225 kVA transformer burns off somewhere around 1500 watts of heat just sitting still. So over $1000 per year at my local kWh rates.Ya but how long is the question
I think your number is a little high. The Conventional rule of thumb is half a percent of KVA which would be 1100 watts. DOE 2016 units can be a lot lower. I have some 25 KVA pole units (DOE2016) that are only 48 watts no load which is about .2 percent. If I remember correctly, the DOE standards don't directly address no load losses, they just address overall efficiency. The way it is calculated typically the easiest way for the manufacturers to meet this is to lower the no load losses.A 225 kVA transformer burns off somewhere around 1500 watts of heat just sitting still. So over $1000 per year at my local kWh rates.
A medium sized metal fab operation is moving to a new building my boss bid on it, but the company engineer changed from 480 to 240 delta at a meeting yesterday when the POCO said they could do a 240 delta padmount.It seems like I have been seeing more 208 volt, thousand amp services nowadays than before, when they were usually 480. Maybe they don't want transformers. I worked in a building last year that was 10 stories and all 208 volts.
Do you mean a 240V high leg Delta?A medium sized metal fab operation is moving to a new building my boss bid on it, but the company engineer changed from 480 to 240 delta at a meeting yesterday when the POCO said they could do a 240 delta padmount.
when we asked why they had four reasons mainly Insurance and safety program cost to have employees around over 480V.
Also they need 240v delta either way for some equipment and the cost of transformer losses are forever.
Do you mean a 240V high leg Delta?
I was actually asking @pipe_bender about the 240V Delta. I was wondering if it was 3Ø and had a high leg. I was asking because I have never seen a padmount transformer for 240V Delta w/high leg. It would have to have at least two transformers to accomplish this. Not many POCOs even provide an open, or closed, Delta service anymore.I like 240 high leg center tapped delta for small to medium occupancies like this.
Full 240 for 3 phase and 1 phase equipment, and also 120 for the office and stuff.
I was actually asking @pipe_bender about the 240V Delta. I was wondering if it was 3Ø and had a high leg. I was asking because I have never seen a padmount transformer for 240V Delta w/high leg. It would have to have at least two transformers to accomplish this. Not many POCOs even provide an open, or closed, Delta service anymore.
The other consideration if in an area where you utilize heating more than cooling is these losses do lessen demand from your heating equipment. So the pros and cons can vary depending on location and application.I think your number is a little high. The Conventional rule of thumb is half a percent of KVA which would be 1100 watts. DOE 2016 units can be a lot lower. I have some 25 KVA pole units (DOE2016) that are only 48 watts no load which is about .2 percent. If I remember correctly, the DOE standards don't directly address no load losses, they just address overall efficiency. The way it is calculated typically the easiest way for the manufacturers to meet this is to lower the no load losses.
But still, I am not a fan of transformer losses for sure. Another thing to consider is if that heat is utilized or will require cooling. That can make it better or worse
That’s sub transmission voltage- 35kV system. We have a circuit of that we work on.You guys don't mess around!
Correct. It can be accomplished with two pad mount transformers.I was actually asking @pipe_bender about the 240V Delta. I was wondering if it was 3Ø and had a high leg. I was asking because I have never seen a padmount transformer for 240V Delta w/high leg. It would have to have at least two transformers to accomplish this. Not many POCOs even provide an open, or closed, Delta service anymore.
I agree, that's all you ever see that used for around here, other than maybe an occasional larger industrial customer with that kind of voltage as their main service voltage.That’s sub transmission voltage- 35kV system. We have a circuit of that we work on.
I agree, that's all you ever see that used for around here, other than maybe an occasional larger industrial customer with that kind of voltage as their main service voltage.
A local POCO had a mile or so run of underground because of proximity to an airport. They one time had a fault in it and needed to repair it. Not sure why but their repair failed upon energizing, found it's way onto barbed wire fencing as well as telephone cabling in the vicinity of the repair. there were damages to phone equipment and small fires here and there originating near fencing or phone equipment within a couple miles or so all around that repair location. Might not been their repair that failed, I know they eventually replaced that entire run not too much later on after this incident.
Eh, whatevs, no one is using that phone stuff anymore anyway , except for maybe that 100 year old lady who has had it since 1952.
Once we put the cable back on it immediately blew out and fire/smoke shot out of the phone pedestal.
NYSEG here in upstate NY has a few 35kV distro lines here and there. Based on my conversations with the planners and linemen, it seems like nobody likes them. I almost got to do an underground primary off one near Chatham. All I would have had to do is procure and pull the cable, POCO terminates each end. Still though, would have been some good bragging rights to say "I pulled some 35kv cable today". Usually when I do these it's off a 4800 Delta system so we have to pull 2 cables.That’s sub transmission voltage- 35kV system. We have a circuit of that we work on.
I once had to do a controls project at the Celilo Converter Station in Oregon, where they take a lot of the hydro power from the Columbia River and send it down the Pacific DC Intertie to Southern California. That Pacific Intertie is 500kVDC on two wires (so +500kV on one, -500kV on the other), meaning it is 1 million volts DC between them. When I asked why it was so high, I was told that even if you have only 1 ohm of resistance per foot of wire, to go 846 miles, there would be a lot of I^R losses. But if the current is only 1 Amp, 1^2 is still 1 and the losses are minimized. So by using 1 million V, 1 A = 1MW of power.Short answer: the powerlines on the utility poles that run for miles are at a higher voltage than typical utilization voltage.
Power loss depends on current (the square of the current, I2*R), and a for a fixed power delivered, current varies inversely with voltage (P = I * V). So using a high voltage on transmission lines reduces power loss for a given power delivered.
Cheers, Wayne
Yeah if you had wire that was 1 ohm per foot, you'd probably need to get up into the billions of volts to accomplish anythingI was told that even if you have only 1 ohm of resistance per foot of wire, to go 846 miles, there would be a lot of I^R losses.
Does that mean somewhere there is a mid point tap that is likely at ground potential?That Pacific Intertie is 500kVDC on two wires (so +500kV on one, -500kV on the other), meaning it is 1 million volts DC between them.