Rob, I like the way you put that. But the problem with me is that where "the bubble bursts" is exactly what I'm curious about. Something interesting happens there. I think it's partly a language failure and also relates to the fundimental structure of nature. I'm not arguing that 2 plus 2 isn't 4.By Rob123:
One of the rules is you cannot divide by zero. You CAN divide by almost-zero. But you CANNOT divide by zero. So, as you infinitely shrink your denominator, all is well. But when you get tired of all that shrinking, and make the giant leap from an infinitesimally small denominator to a zero denominator, the bubble bursts. All bets are off. You cheated. The math is no longer valid. Case closed! And you can refuse all you like, but the game is still over.
the "bubble bursts" at a mathematical discontinuity. The interesting thing that happens there is that it suddenly becomes undefined. Nothing more and nothing less (in this case, at least). But it is a "language failure" of sorts...you are refusing (or unwilling?) to accept elements of the mathematical language, and/or the thinking that accompanies it. As for the part about the fundamental structure of nature...the math describes it perfectly & completely (again, in this case at least).Rob, I like the way you put that. But the problem with me is that where "the bubble bursts" is exactly what I'm curious about. Something interesting happens there. I think it's partly a language failure and also relates to the fundimental structure of nature. I'm not arguing that 2 plus 2 isn't 4.
There are two languages in the conversation of this thread. One is verbal and the other is mathematical. In the language of math, as has been said by others in this thread, division by zero is indeterminate.it's partly a language failure
If we allow those two expressions as mere conversational representations of actual mathematical concepts, then I can prove (I kid you not), using valid mathematical processes (none of this 2 = 1 stuff), that both are equal to 42!Originally posted by al hildenbrand: There are several ways to arrive at this point in the language of math. </font><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">
- <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">0 ? 0</font>
- <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Infinity ? Infinity</font>
LOL! Now how did you guess that? And when was I declared Keeper of The Mathematical Rules? And how do you know if my hands are folded?From what I can guess you're just too happy to keep it that way. Since when does everybody fold their hands and say what you've just said?
All this is true, but since we pay more for "Reduced Fat and Cholesteral" items, isn't nothing actually more?Originally posted by physis:
----Disclaimer----
THIS IS A GUEST POST (NOT PHYSIS GENERATED)
In discussing the subject here with Sam, I have asked him to please let me comment:
The rules of math can not be changed. If you have nothing, it doesn't matter how many times you want to divide it or multiply it, You still have nothing. If you flip it over,(or as Sam prefers I say, "the inverse of nothing") still leaves you with nothing.
Thats exactly why I brought up conductance earlier. The infinity is actually just the inverse of zero current, which is really isn't that mysterious.The rules of math can not be changed. If you have nothing, it doesn't matter how many times you want to divide it or multiply it, You still have nothing. If you flip it over,(or as Sam prefers I say, "the inverse of nothing") still leaves you with nothing.
Was that a typo? Didn?t you mean ?quark authors??Originally posted by steve66:One word of caution though: there are a lot quack "authors" . . .
But I still insist that if you divide nothing by nothing, you get a result of 42. Here is the proof:Originally posted by ?a guest of physis?:If you have nothing, it doesn't matter how many times you want to divide it or multiply it, You still have nothing.
I agree 42 is the answer to life, the universe, and everything. Now if someone could only figure out what the question is??But I still insist that if you divide nothing by nothing, you get a result of 42.