It’s all about the little details

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pretty unequivocable.
250.52(A)(3) has an informational note at the end, like many other sections, I have seen may of these stated here as "not allowed", what would make one informational note OK to call out, but not another ? seems a bit subjective.
 
250.52(A)(3) has an informational note at the end, like many other sections, I have seen may of these stated here as "not allowed", what would make one informational note OK to call out, but not another ? seems a bit subjective.
The code specifically says that informational notes are not enforceable. You can't get around that.
 
Unless it's a specific Code violation, and not a subjective one, if the man paying the bill is happy... "drive off" (around here referenced as FIDO)
 
You're the inspector making the call.

Our input is not needed on this matter.

JAP>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top