- Location
- Massachusetts
Re: It Never Ceases To Amaze Me
Nothing wrong with that.
What I meant was if I bought a house that later burned, collapsed etc and I could prove it was caused by improper work done by the previous owner I do not see anything that would prohibit me from a civil suit.
That of course is just my untrained opinion.

In other words buyer beware.Originally posted by celtic:
It would be the onus of the new buyer to perform due diligence.
Nothing wrong with that.
What I meant was if I bought a house that later burned, collapsed etc and I could prove it was caused by improper work done by the previous owner I do not see anything that would prohibit me from a civil suit.
That of course is just my untrained opinion.