Jim, the requirement is for working GFCI protection, not simply a GFCI breaker in the panel that has been rigged not to work.Originally posted by jimwalker:
Bob, the gfci is required on our T poles.You do not need to have a 240 receptacle but if you do it must be gfci
Roger I am sure there is a local amendment to 527.6.Originally posted by roger:
Are they using the NEC as reason for requiring the GFCI or is it a local code?
Roger
I guess your joking here as he would need to run an GEC to them from the bonding point, the EGC does not count.Originally posted by jimwalker:
There would already be 2 ground rods on this house that he is hooking up.
You're probably right.Originally posted by iwire:
Roger I am sure there is a local amendment to 527.6.
It is probably right beside the one for 406.6![]()
Can you gather them up and have them attend your classes....please?Originally posted by bphgravity:
just a bunch of wacky inspectors working in backwards jurisdictions.
I think it would behoove the inspectors and contractors to take some your classes Bryan.Originally posted by iwire:
Can you gather them up and have them attend your classes....please?Originally posted by bphgravity:
just a bunch of wacky inspectors working in backwards jurisdictions.![]()
