Re: Kitchen Floor Receptacles
hi guys; I've got to take the ex English major position on this one. If the intent of the nec was to allow other 15 amp circuits in kitchens besides the ones mentioned, it would have worded the 99 revised wording fdifferently. The handbook to the 99 nec specifically states that the wording was meant to tighten and clarify past editions. If there was ANY variation allowed it would have been mentioned there in that explanation (when the wording was changed). The big words that dominate is that "the outlets shall be served..." and this cannot mean some shall be served.
I respect Mike Holt and his work, but this only proves he is human. References to electrical authorities can lead to confusion, as it is an assertion about meaning that may or may not be what the nec itself has said, what the words actually say, or even what seems how it must be interpreted to make sense. Also references to authority muddy the water with feelings about WHO is saying what, when it is more important to see what is specifically said.
there might some difference between the 2002 on this issue, but I can only see this on one way, only specifically exempted items nay be other than specified, lighting, clock outlets, gas stove electronics, and nothing else.
logic and language, common sense about enforceability, unanimity among inspectors, the nec itself, all call outthe strict meaning of this rule.
sorry to disagree with you guys, but this one seems too straight up,
paul