The LED's have an electronic ballast in them. I would wonder what the local magnetic fields from the MRI might do to the new lamps.
That is not a problem.
I would worry much more about what the RF emissions from the LEDs would do to the very sensitive electronics of the MRI equipment.
CT scanners use radiation and electronic radiation detectors to do their imaging. The radiation detectors are not particularly sensitive to RF and can be pretty easily shielded.
MRI machines, OTOH, detect very low intensity RF emitted and absorbed differently by atoms immersed in a strong magnetic field. Any RF emission near the machine, whether from the drivers or from the LEDs themselves cannot be tolerated by the MRI equipment. Think of the MRI machine as combining a radio transmitter and a sensitive radio receiver (with directional antennas) with a strong and variable magnetic field.
That is why the purpose-built LED fixtures for MRI environments use remotely mounted drivers and EMI filters between the drivers and the LEDs to minimize RF emission in the MRI room.
The emissions from standard screw-in replacements vary enormously from brand to brand and model to model. Even if you could find low-emission bulbs that would be acceptable, there is no guarantee that the same identical bulbs with the same RF specifications will be available in the future.
This is a highly specialized area, and I would not recommend relying on shirt pocket engineering by an electrician or even an ordinary lighting designer.